What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
50mm Zeiss SF --- When??!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3476585" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>Hi Chosun,</p><p>Zeiss were producing machine aspherics in the 1930s using machines developed by others before them.</p><p>But obviously Sony's machine is much more capable, although I wonder how it copes with wear and how do you test the finished optical surface?</p><p></p><p>Astro testing on the stars only tests surface accuracy, alignment and aberrations.</p><p></p><p>For contrast with binoculars one needs terrestrial testing for contrast and colour rendition.</p><p></p><p>Planetary observations with large telescopes tests contrast well and also ones eyes. But planets are too small for binoculars.</p><p></p><p>Faint contrast detail on Saturn always eluded my eyes, although others saw it well.</p><p>Similarly, some see detail on Neptune and Uranus, others never.</p><p>I never saw detail on Jupiter's moons, others do.</p><p></p><p>Planetary testing is more severe than star testing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3476585, member: 111403"] Hi Chosun, Zeiss were producing machine aspherics in the 1930s using machines developed by others before them. But obviously Sony's machine is much more capable, although I wonder how it copes with wear and how do you test the finished optical surface? Astro testing on the stars only tests surface accuracy, alignment and aberrations. For contrast with binoculars one needs terrestrial testing for contrast and colour rendition. Planetary observations with large telescopes tests contrast well and also ones eyes. But planets are too small for binoculars. Faint contrast detail on Saturn always eluded my eyes, although others saw it well. Similarly, some see detail on Neptune and Uranus, others never. I never saw detail on Jupiter's moons, others do. Planetary testing is more severe than star testing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
50mm Zeiss SF --- When??!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top