What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
50mm Zeiss SF --- When??!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3477238" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>Thank you very much for the interesting information, maico.</p><p></p><p>I was offered 6 Zoomar 180mm f/1.3 motion picture lenses at about £650 a time many years ago.</p><p>I wasn't interested in even one.</p><p>But he had an incomplete one at £25 in its trunk, which I bought.</p><p>I managed to get all sorts of adaptors from someone else for next to nothing for Contarex etc etc and Minolta.</p><p>I put it on my Minolta and although the ring was missing I could operate it with say a pencil.</p><p></p><p>Although it was a half frame 35mm camera lens, it worked absolutely fine at full aperture. The field was curved, but flat on half frame or movie format. On full frame 35mm the edges were soft but most of centre sharp at f/1.3.</p><p>It was fast, although I can't say it was easy to hand hold. I usually balanced it on something.</p><p></p><p>The seller was not happy when I showed him the photos I took with what he thought was a non functioning lens.</p><p></p><p>They also made a 240mm f/1.2 Zoomar/Kilfitt, I think, for medium format. It is big.</p><p>There were Kilfitt adaptors I think for all sorts of movie and film cameras.</p><p></p><p>I have, though, seen much bigger lenses such as 14 inch f/0.75 weighing I think 350 lbs. Mounted on a truck.</p><p></p><p>The top makers have developed strategies for using Calcium fluorite, probably by coating straight away, although coating is probably very difficult in this case. Then sealing the element in so no moisture gets in.</p><p>By controlling things carefully they probably don't get many failures now, although they probably did early on.</p><p></p><p>I would not choose a crystal lens scope if I was in a tropical jungle environment. Eventually nature has its way and moisture gets in.</p><p></p><p>But I take the point that most Kowa scopes are fine, although I suppose any problems are immediately dealt with by Kowa, a top maker of exotic optics.</p><p></p><p>P.S.</p><p>I think the calcium fluorite has problems with laser light and deep UV, but I don't know the details.</p><p>Quartz is used in things like some of the Questars, I think.</p><p></p><p>P.P.S.</p><p>Those early Canon 300mm f/2.8 were often sold off at £100 or less because of the serious degradation of the calcium fluorite element.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3477238, member: 111403"] Thank you very much for the interesting information, maico. I was offered 6 Zoomar 180mm f/1.3 motion picture lenses at about £650 a time many years ago. I wasn't interested in even one. But he had an incomplete one at £25 in its trunk, which I bought. I managed to get all sorts of adaptors from someone else for next to nothing for Contarex etc etc and Minolta. I put it on my Minolta and although the ring was missing I could operate it with say a pencil. Although it was a half frame 35mm camera lens, it worked absolutely fine at full aperture. The field was curved, but flat on half frame or movie format. On full frame 35mm the edges were soft but most of centre sharp at f/1.3. It was fast, although I can't say it was easy to hand hold. I usually balanced it on something. The seller was not happy when I showed him the photos I took with what he thought was a non functioning lens. They also made a 240mm f/1.2 Zoomar/Kilfitt, I think, for medium format. It is big. There were Kilfitt adaptors I think for all sorts of movie and film cameras. I have, though, seen much bigger lenses such as 14 inch f/0.75 weighing I think 350 lbs. Mounted on a truck. The top makers have developed strategies for using Calcium fluorite, probably by coating straight away, although coating is probably very difficult in this case. Then sealing the element in so no moisture gets in. By controlling things carefully they probably don't get many failures now, although they probably did early on. I would not choose a crystal lens scope if I was in a tropical jungle environment. Eventually nature has its way and moisture gets in. But I take the point that most Kowa scopes are fine, although I suppose any problems are immediately dealt with by Kowa, a top maker of exotic optics. P.S. I think the calcium fluorite has problems with laser light and deep UV, but I don't know the details. Quartz is used in things like some of the Questars, I think. P.P.S. Those early Canon 300mm f/2.8 were often sold off at £100 or less because of the serious degradation of the calcium fluorite element. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
50mm Zeiss SF --- When??!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top