Huh??? Pray tell?Wowee!
It's got to be something I said wouldn't happen. I 'll eat my words next year, well done Leica. Brilliant stuff.![]()
The size of the oculars relative to the rest does suggest 32mm, the shape suggests Perger prisms and unfortunately the large bridge at the objective end suggests rangefinder. We'll see soon enough.Noctivid 32mm I assume. It looks oddly shaped though ... could it be one of those rangefinders ?
Was excited for a Noctivid, but think the shape is just too odd. It's probably a rangefinderIf you Google the string: Leica "True Greatness"
there are a couple of short film clips loaded to Leica facebook hunting sites 3 weeks ago.
I’ve attached the only image with text 'Little things make big things happen'.
And enlarging the image . . . as Beth indicates, perhaps a x32 Geovid Perger prism rangefinder binocular?
The marketing title smacks of 32mm - " the little things ". But perhaps see this....Sadly, I doubt I can afford it. It may be quite heavy too (for me). Still excited to see more about it on 1/06
Noctivid 32mm I assume. It looks oddly shaped though ... could it be one of those rangefinders ?
Looks like it could be a mid-sized Geovid.The marketing title smacks of 32mm - " the little things ".
The YouTube guys forgot about Uppendahl, which is the "other" prism Leica uses in its rangerfinder models. As far as I know they are the last remaining Uppendahl binoculars.The marketing title smacks of 32mm - " the little things ". But perhaps see this....
Have I already crashed and burned?
Wouldn't THAT be cool! I'd love it.It’s a 7x32 Noctivid - that’s my story and I’m sticking with it!
The Youtube is intriguing for several reasons. I suppose these are Leica reps discussing the Perger prism, right? Well, the left guy says he would be very interested in a non-rangefinder model, i.e. a conventional binocular having the Perger prisms on board. Could this be an indication that Leica is entertaining this option seriously?The marketing title smacks of 32mm - " the little things ". But perhaps see this....
Have I already crashed and burned?
I agree that was a strange comment, I believe he meant to say something else; in fact he also said that using a Perger prism "you can see what's in front of you ...and also behind".The Youtube is intriguing for several reasons. I suppose these are Leica reps discussing the Perger prism, right? Well, the left guy says he would be very interested in a non-rangefinder model, i.e. a conventional binocular having the Perger prisms on board. Could this be an indication that Leica is entertaining this option seriously?
Then the disapointment: when discussing the advantages of the Perger, two aspects are mentioned, relatively better light transmission and better 3D experience. I have no doubts the Perger prism, which is essentially a porro 1 type, is a superb component to achieve optical excellence, I even think it should be the first choice because it's theoretically better than any roof prism (NB. optically, not counting ergonomic aspects). But more threedimensionality? This is the first time I've heard someone state that prism types as such, i.e. on their own, would differ in the way they handle depth and space. Of course most porro binoculars as we know them show this property, and we know why. But on their own, as a component?
Renze