What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Tripod and Heads
700RC2 or alternatives?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alexis Powell" data-source="post: 3468556" data-attributes="member: 5327"><p>I went from Bogen 3126 (similar to your 3130, but w/o quick release) to the 700RC2. In my experience, the latter is not nearly as smooth or adjustable in tension, and is highly variable unit to unit. One thing that I don't like about the 700RC2 (based on experience with several) is that when the tension is adjusted low (Note: some units never become truly low tension, limited by the viscous grease in the design. In my experience these heads do not become smoother at all in use), the head becomes wobbly. Both of those heads are limited in the ease with which one can balance a scope that is nose or tail heavy because they both take drop-in plates. But the 700RC2 sure saves a lot of weight, so I used it with my light rig for a long time. I'm much happier with the Gitzo 1720, which is lighter, more adjustable, doesn't get wobbly at low tension, can take different length plates to balance different scopes, can be adapted to the Arca-Swiss QR plate standard, and is easier to adjust with its single big knob. I don't have any relevant experience with alternatives.</p><p></p><p>--AP</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alexis Powell, post: 3468556, member: 5327"] I went from Bogen 3126 (similar to your 3130, but w/o quick release) to the 700RC2. In my experience, the latter is not nearly as smooth or adjustable in tension, and is highly variable unit to unit. One thing that I don't like about the 700RC2 (based on experience with several) is that when the tension is adjusted low (Note: some units never become truly low tension, limited by the viscous grease in the design. In my experience these heads do not become smoother at all in use), the head becomes wobbly. Both of those heads are limited in the ease with which one can balance a scope that is nose or tail heavy because they both take drop-in plates. But the 700RC2 sure saves a lot of weight, so I used it with my light rig for a long time. I'm much happier with the Gitzo 1720, which is lighter, more adjustable, doesn't get wobbly at low tension, can take different length plates to balance different scopes, can be adapted to the Arca-Swiss QR plate standard, and is easier to adjust with its single big knob. I don't have any relevant experience with alternatives. --AP [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Tripod and Heads
700RC2 or alternatives?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top