What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
7D versus Mark IV: Pixels per bird
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashetos" data-source="post: 1649351" data-attributes="member: 79673"><p>I think you are trying to convince me for something that we totally agree: more megapixels are more than desirable, especially for bird photographers, for the detail and the crop capability (pixels per bird), provided the pixel quality is acceptable. But, using your example I could say that with current technology, a 12000X8000 FF sensor would also be crap. </p><p></p><p>So it all comes down to a compromise of pixel size and pixel quality with given technology.</p><p></p><p>By the way I do not own a 5D Mark II (although I know very well its capablilites from a colleaque which we go bird photography on a regular basis), but a 40D, and actually I might buy the 7D very soon, so no sentimantal links with any of the above mentioned bodies!</p><p></p><p>Thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashetos, post: 1649351, member: 79673"] I think you are trying to convince me for something that we totally agree: more megapixels are more than desirable, especially for bird photographers, for the detail and the crop capability (pixels per bird), provided the pixel quality is acceptable. But, using your example I could say that with current technology, a 12000X8000 FF sensor would also be crap. So it all comes down to a compromise of pixel size and pixel quality with given technology. By the way I do not own a 5D Mark II (although I know very well its capablilites from a colleaque which we go bird photography on a regular basis), but a 40D, and actually I might buy the 7D very soon, so no sentimantal links with any of the above mentioned bodies! Thanks [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
7D versus Mark IV: Pixels per bird
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top