What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
7x42 SLC vs 10x42 SLC?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RJM" data-source="post: 1688050" data-attributes="member: 66340"><p>There is a school of thought (I think derived from astronomical observation) that says since your pupil dilation normally does exceed 2-3mm during daylight hours, any binocular that produces larger exit pupils is a "waste" of light. </p><p> </p><p>I am not so sure what is true at night is true during the day based on my own experiments. A larger exit pupil binocular is almost always easier and more enjoyable to look through and that alone may be why they can sometimes seem "brighter". But I suspect just bringing the binocular to your eye causes the pupil to dilate more than the normal 2-3mm since it is now deeply shaded by the eyecups. I have not been able to come up with a suitable test to "prove" my hypotheses though.</p><p> </p><p>Now that technological advances allow many 42mm bins to approximate the size/weight of their 32mm brothers, I prefer the larger aperture and a 7x-8x mag for the steadier and wider fields. But I also have a small Nikon ED50 fieldscope and Canon 18x50IS when higher mag is the necessity of the day.</p><p> </p><p>happy 2010,</p><p>Rick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RJM, post: 1688050, member: 66340"] There is a school of thought (I think derived from astronomical observation) that says since your pupil dilation normally does exceed 2-3mm during daylight hours, any binocular that produces larger exit pupils is a "waste" of light. I am not so sure what is true at night is true during the day based on my own experiments. A larger exit pupil binocular is almost always easier and more enjoyable to look through and that alone may be why they can sometimes seem "brighter". But I suspect just bringing the binocular to your eye causes the pupil to dilate more than the normal 2-3mm since it is now deeply shaded by the eyecups. I have not been able to come up with a suitable test to "prove" my hypotheses though. Now that technological advances allow many 42mm bins to approximate the size/weight of their 32mm brothers, I prefer the larger aperture and a 7x-8x mag for the steadier and wider fields. But I also have a small Nikon ED50 fieldscope and Canon 18x50IS when higher mag is the necessity of the day. happy 2010, Rick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
7x42 SLC vs 10x42 SLC?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top