What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
7x42 SLC vs 10x42 SLC?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 1689120" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>Matt,</p><p></p><p>The notion of "exit pupil matching" as expressed by optical folks is really oversimplified and often misleading, — primarily because it overlooks the adaptive processes of the eye, in which pupil diameter is a rather minor player. It's somewhat like the tail wagging the dog. </p><p></p><p>Optically, it is true that the larger exit pupil of a 7x42 would potentially allow 3.6 times as much light to enter the eye as a 10x42, and this seems impressive. However, considering that the eye's sensitivity has an adaptive range of six orders of magnitude (i.e., <em>a million to one</em>) it's really rather insignificant. </p><p></p><p>The primary function of the iris (pupil), it would appear, is to protect the eye from too much light rather than to allow more in. This is evidenced by the reluctance of the iris to expand and its great willingness to contract. Full expansion takes about 30 min., whereas full contraction takes only seconds or even fractions of a second. </p><p></p><p>Contrary to what is often assumed, the aperture of the pupil is also <em>not</em> a constant function of light intensity, because the sensitivity of the retina changes as a result of adaptation. Thus, when light intensity increases moderately, the pupil constricts, but then under constant illumination it gradually dilates again. With larger increases in intensity, the pupil will remain constricted as a physical protection. On the opposite end, as the eye becomes starved for light the iris gradually opens to its maximum, but much more importantly the retina <em>increases sensitivity</em> by orders of magnitude. If the iris were really all that critical there would probably be no old astronomers. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I think ergonomic factors such as eye relief, image stability, ease of visual alignment, perceived depth, and apparent field are much more important in selecting a 7x vs 10x binoculars. Most of these factors were mentioned above.</p><p></p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 1689120, member: 14473"] Matt, The notion of "exit pupil matching" as expressed by optical folks is really oversimplified and often misleading, — primarily because it overlooks the adaptive processes of the eye, in which pupil diameter is a rather minor player. It's somewhat like the tail wagging the dog. Optically, it is true that the larger exit pupil of a 7x42 would potentially allow 3.6 times as much light to enter the eye as a 10x42, and this seems impressive. However, considering that the eye's sensitivity has an adaptive range of six orders of magnitude (i.e., [i]a million to one[/i]) it's really rather insignificant. The primary function of the iris (pupil), it would appear, is to protect the eye from too much light rather than to allow more in. This is evidenced by the reluctance of the iris to expand and its great willingness to contract. Full expansion takes about 30 min., whereas full contraction takes only seconds or even fractions of a second. Contrary to what is often assumed, the aperture of the pupil is also [i]not[/i] a constant function of light intensity, because the sensitivity of the retina changes as a result of adaptation. Thus, when light intensity increases moderately, the pupil constricts, but then under constant illumination it gradually dilates again. With larger increases in intensity, the pupil will remain constricted as a physical protection. On the opposite end, as the eye becomes starved for light the iris gradually opens to its maximum, but much more importantly the retina [i]increases sensitivity[/i] by orders of magnitude. If the iris were really all that critical there would probably be no old astronomers. Personally, I think ergonomic factors such as eye relief, image stability, ease of visual alignment, perceived depth, and apparent field are much more important in selecting a 7x vs 10x binoculars. Most of these factors were mentioned above. Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
7x42 SLC vs 10x42 SLC?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top