What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
7x50 vs 8x42
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 3256875" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>ON,</p><p></p><p>I have the 7x35 Aculon, and while the center sharpness is impressive due to the aspheric optics, and the FOV is expansive at 9.3*, the edges can only be described as "crummy" at best. </p><p></p><p>So I took a look at the specs on the 7x50 Aculons since you mentioned they have the best edge performance in the series, and now I see why! The 7x50s only have a 6.4° FOV (42.7° AFOV). I think that would cause claustrophobia for terrestrial use but probably work okay for stargazing. I prefer the 7x50 Vixen Foresta with its 7.1* FOV (still moderate but with good sized sweet spot). Also very nice color saturation and contrast for nature observing. I was really surprised how good it was, worth the extra cost, and at 30 oz., no hernia belt needed. </p><p></p><p>OFF</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 3256875, member: 665"] ON, I have the 7x35 Aculon, and while the center sharpness is impressive due to the aspheric optics, and the FOV is expansive at 9.3*, the edges can only be described as "crummy" at best. So I took a look at the specs on the 7x50 Aculons since you mentioned they have the best edge performance in the series, and now I see why! The 7x50s only have a 6.4° FOV (42.7° AFOV). I think that would cause claustrophobia for terrestrial use but probably work okay for stargazing. I prefer the 7x50 Vixen Foresta with its 7.1* FOV (still moderate but with good sized sweet spot). Also very nice color saturation and contrast for nature observing. I was really surprised how good it was, worth the extra cost, and at 30 oz., no hernia belt needed. OFF [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
7x50 vs 8x42
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top