If "small" is a major factor, scratch off the EDG 32mm which is on the large side for a 32, almost as big the 7x42 Leica UV (and only 100g lighter). I included a photo below of 5 models I had in position at the time I was testing 32's, so you can see how tiny the little Leica is (quite a bit smaller than the 8x30 Swaro CL!) and how large the EDG 32 is. The Conquest HD and Kowa Genesis are in the middle, and pretty typical size for "normal" 32mm binoculars.
IMO - if you want premium optics, compact size / low weight AND good glare resistance, the Leica UV 8x32 is unmatched. Nothing is that small while also providing such premium optical quality and great glare control. Note that the older Trinovids (BA/BN) are a bit chunkier than the Ultravid, and ~100g heavier.
Literally the only flaw of the 8x32 UV in my mind is the finicky eye position / short eye relief. The eye relief makes it problematic for some who wear glasses (although my wife seems to be fine with it). And even if (like me) you don't wear glasses, it's not as "easy" a view as the 7x42 (which I also have). Ironically, despite having shortish eye relief, the eyecups could use an extra click of extension if you like to push them into the socket. After using the 7x42 (my main birding bin) switching to the 8x32 feels fussier, but once I adapt and get used to it everything is fine.
But other than that, you get a view that is very similar to the 7x42 but in a tiny 530g package. The 8x32 was a slightly lesser FOV but because of the higher mag it has a greater AFOV than the 7x42, but otherwise their views are more similar than different.
So, assuming you don't wear thick glasses such that you need long ER, I would just go with the Leica 8x32 and call it a day. If this will be a backup bin for you, I would recommend finding a used 8x32 HD (non plus) for a huge discount vs buying a new HD+.
View attachment 1365344
Another shot showing the compactness of the 8x32 Ultravid (middle) vs 32mm EDG (right) and 42mm Trinovid BR (left):
View attachment 1365345