This.
-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
8x42 vs. 10x50 dawn/twilight (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter ReinierB
- Start date
tenex
reality-based
Better at what? The 8x should be a bit brighter (for most people) and show color better, but the 10x should show more detail.
Better at this.
Thanks. So you all agree that the 8x42 is a bit brighter than the 10x42. So probably about 10-15 minutes longer useful at dusk.
842 is brighter than 1042? Depends. If so, is it enough to matter? Also depends.
".....minutes longer at dusk." How important is that? Light gathering, whether via coatings/glass/optical design components or exit pupil, (see Gils above) is useful throughout the day. Not a small point. With high sun or even one off to the side, not everything is perfectly illuminated, some stuff is in shade/shadow. Trees, brush, overhanging marsh grass all create darkness, whenever. Light gathering ability lets you see into and discern stuff. Picking out a scrambling Ridgway Rail as it shoots the curl of marsh grass covering a mud bank at mid tide is helped with light gathering, whenever.
Paultricounty
Well-known member
Vortex UHdThere's still a bunch of AK-prism bins in the low-light segment. HT, Conquest, Victory RF, SLC etc.
Abbe/Koenig Roof Prism Binoculars - Optics-Trade
Abbe/Koenig Roof Prism Binocularswww.optics-trade.eu
ragin-cajun
Well-known member
I contemplated a 42 but went with an SLC 8x56. it's a flashlight at dark 30, which is what I wanted.
tenex
reality-based
I agree that if this is what really matters to you, it's worth going all the way to 56mm. Otherwise the difference is modest.
In a blind test, where folks do not know which glass they are looking (not sure how you would do that) I believe that the results would come out random.
I don’t think average human vision can distinguish a 5.25 mm exit pupil from a 5.00 mm exit pupil.
Any knowledge of which glass was which would bias the result. You would also need a fairly large sample, to avoid the pitfalls of small-sample statistics.
I don’t think average human vision can distinguish a 5.25 mm exit pupil from a 5.00 mm exit pupil.
Any knowledge of which glass was which would bias the result. You would also need a fairly large sample, to avoid the pitfalls of small-sample statistics.
Yeah, but fortunately for the spec sheets, any good micrometer can.
What's your point and which posts are you even responding to?
The first sentences of the thread are "I wonder, which one will be better for dawn/twilight? Or would that be subjective?"
Perhaps I wasn't clear. I wasn't talking about measuring the exit pupils for a spec sheet, but distinguishing the two binoculars by actually looking through them and deciding which was the brighter.
My point was that I don't think anyone could tell which one they were looking through, using only the criterion of perceived image brightness.
Last edited:
I just got four pairs of binoculars in the last few days, three of which are in that picture, so I haven't spent much time with them yet, and also wouldn't really know what to be looking for, but if I've understood correctly, the lower powered binoculars are more forgiving? I've got an idea of how I want to deal with the lack of a strap, but also probably won't be actually carrying it anyway, just using in from car or house.
Those are both correct. Spec sheets area of importance lies only in being able to convey information across distance and for comparative purposes. My 6x24 Trinovid which might look terrible on paper is an absolute joy to look through.
Always use a strap , I learned the hard way LOL.
Just a couple hours ago I was thinking about a workaround for the lack of the proprietary strap and until I do that it'll just be a house binocular.
There's quite a few of these old Leitz out there with the strap buttons and I'll post some pics when I finally get around to working it out.
lilcrazy2
Well-known member
I've always wondered how the Razor UHD would compare to the Alpen Teton with AK prisms, particularly since the Teton is 1/4 the cost.
Ok, you've got me, Jerry, I'll have to give a pair of these a go...
I've been trialling a pair of 8x56 SLC's to use as my low light binoculars, but we're not getting on too well, mainly due to the lack of intermediate click stops on the eyecups. Yes, I could probably adapt them with o-rings, but I like a glass (especially an expensive one) to work for me straight out of the box, without having to be adapted. That's just me. Extraordinary glass in low light, really, but they've got to go. (I note William Lewis is letting his recently acquired copy go too, which surprised me).
I know eye relief will be tight, but having recently discovered that I can easily use (and see full FOV) an Ultravid 8x32 or Kowa Genesis 8x33 wearing glasses, I'm confident that these should work for me.
The search is on...
William Lewis
Wishing birdwatching paid the bills.
Hi Bentley 03
I didn't want to part with them but thankfully the wife has allowed them to stay, few financial bumps in the road!
I know what you mean about eye cup position on them though - tricky! I use the last but one click stop which is actually one click ( approx 2mm) further out than the last click stop - the difference between that and the final click stop seems the smallest gap between stops so I think I'm lucky that's the one that fits.
There's been some discussion recently highlighting that the eye cups for the 8x 10x and 15x are all interchangeable and I believe that swaro may well provide them free of charge so depending on your needs you may be able to find a "factory fit" work around.
All the best
Will
Similar threads
