What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
A "4/3 or Superzoom" thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njlarsen" data-source="post: 1756858" data-attributes="member: 7427"><p>I used to have a film SLR with a long lens. I know I could have a better camera if I went the dSLR way, but I have chosen the superzoom, because the best camera is the one you have when you need it, and my Panasonic FZ18 is very light and fits in a belt pouch. Look at my gallery here, just about every picture I have taken lately is with this camera (I don't have the 1.7x converter). </p><p></p><p>The four/thirds and especially the micro version of them seems tempting, but Sigma seems to no longer support the format, which means that the only lenses available are the Olympus 300mm (corresponding to 600 mm reach on a film slr). Panasonic is rumoured to bring out a 100-300 zoom for the micro-four/thirds format. If you adapt a lens from a different source to the micro format, you are basically back to the size of a canon or nikon dSLR in your kit anyway. </p><p></p><p>Niels</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njlarsen, post: 1756858, member: 7427"] I used to have a film SLR with a long lens. I know I could have a better camera if I went the dSLR way, but I have chosen the superzoom, because the best camera is the one you have when you need it, and my Panasonic FZ18 is very light and fits in a belt pouch. Look at my gallery here, just about every picture I have taken lately is with this camera (I don't have the 1.7x converter). The four/thirds and especially the micro version of them seems tempting, but Sigma seems to no longer support the format, which means that the only lenses available are the Olympus 300mm (corresponding to 600 mm reach on a film slr). Panasonic is rumoured to bring out a 100-300 zoom for the micro-four/thirds format. If you adapt a lens from a different source to the micro format, you are basically back to the size of a canon or nikon dSLR in your kit anyway. Niels [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
A "4/3 or Superzoom" thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top