qwerty5
Controversial opinion generator
I recently had the chance to compare my Vortex Diamondback (non-HD) 10x42 with my dad's Leupold Yosemite 10x30. I admit this review isn't really fair since the Diamondback has a larger objective and is a more expensive binocular. However, porros are generally easier to make cheaper than roofs. Keep in mind that Vortex upgraded the Diamondbacks in 2018 so any optical advantages of the Diamondback in my review are likely to be magnified in the current Diamondback HD.
Build Quality:
Both binoculars felt solid and well built. However, being a porro, I felt the Yosemite's oculars and focuser were more fragile and prone to get knocked around or broken. The eyecups on the Yosemite were loose and finicky, sometimes moving out of position. By contrast, the Diamondback eyecups are very solid and never move out of position unless I want them to. The objective lens cover tethers on the Yosemite were loose and I felt that they could fall off during use. The hinge on the Yosemite was much too tight, while the Diamondback is a little loose.
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Ergonomics and Ease of Use:
The Yosemite is a short, fat porro. The Diamondback looks tall and thin by comparison. In actuality, they are about the same width, but the Diamondback is about 2-3 inches taller. Both fit into my hands very well, but the Diamondback fits my face a little more comfortably than the Yosemite. Overall, I prefer the look of the Diamondback over the Yosemite.
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Focus:
The Yosemite's focus is lightning fast, much too fast for me, and I found myself over-adjusting constantly. The Diamondback's focus is much slower and seems to pop into focus much easier. However, there is some play in the Diamondback's focus wheel, which the Yosemite does not have
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Weight:
The Yosemite was noticeably lighter in the hand, but this should be expected from a 30mm binocular.
Winner: Leupold Yosemite
Field of View:
The Yosemite's field of view was noticeably wider than the Diamondback. The difference was slight, but definitely there.
Winner: Leupold Yosemite
Brightness:
The two were both equally bright during the day. Towards sunset, the Diamondback was brighter, but this should be expected given the larger exit pupil.
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Sharpness/Resolution:
This is where the Diamondback really outpaced the Yosemite. I studied corn silks in a cornfield and found I could see more texture and individual silks with the Diamondback. I was able to read far-away letters more clearly with the Diamondback. I thought I could see a bit more detail on starlings at a distance with the Diamondback. Overall, the Diamondback provided a clearer, more detailed image than the Yosemite. Both seemed to me to have good sharpness from the center to the edge.
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Chromatic Aberration:
Both binoculars showed a similar amount of CA, small but noticeable.
Winner: Tie
Glare Control:
The Diamondback produces a noticeable veiling glare in low light when looking at dark objects, but only at certain angles. I did not test the Yosemite much, but found no glare when looking at the same object at the same time that I found glare in the Diamondback.
Winner: Leupold Yosemite
Summary:
The Vortex Diamondback has better build quality, resolution, and brightness, and is the better binocular. Both binoculars are very good quality for their low price. Is the Diamondback worth $100 more than the Yosemite? Absolutely yes. Is the Yosemite worth its price? Absolutely yes. The Yosemite has been discontinued by Leupold, so new samples will run out eventually. It all comes down to how much one is willing to spend. I will always recommend the Diamondback, but the Yosemite is a solid choice for someone who doesn't want to shell out the extra cash.
Build Quality:
Both binoculars felt solid and well built. However, being a porro, I felt the Yosemite's oculars and focuser were more fragile and prone to get knocked around or broken. The eyecups on the Yosemite were loose and finicky, sometimes moving out of position. By contrast, the Diamondback eyecups are very solid and never move out of position unless I want them to. The objective lens cover tethers on the Yosemite were loose and I felt that they could fall off during use. The hinge on the Yosemite was much too tight, while the Diamondback is a little loose.
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Ergonomics and Ease of Use:
The Yosemite is a short, fat porro. The Diamondback looks tall and thin by comparison. In actuality, they are about the same width, but the Diamondback is about 2-3 inches taller. Both fit into my hands very well, but the Diamondback fits my face a little more comfortably than the Yosemite. Overall, I prefer the look of the Diamondback over the Yosemite.
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Focus:
The Yosemite's focus is lightning fast, much too fast for me, and I found myself over-adjusting constantly. The Diamondback's focus is much slower and seems to pop into focus much easier. However, there is some play in the Diamondback's focus wheel, which the Yosemite does not have
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Weight:
The Yosemite was noticeably lighter in the hand, but this should be expected from a 30mm binocular.
Winner: Leupold Yosemite
Field of View:
The Yosemite's field of view was noticeably wider than the Diamondback. The difference was slight, but definitely there.
Winner: Leupold Yosemite
Brightness:
The two were both equally bright during the day. Towards sunset, the Diamondback was brighter, but this should be expected given the larger exit pupil.
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Sharpness/Resolution:
This is where the Diamondback really outpaced the Yosemite. I studied corn silks in a cornfield and found I could see more texture and individual silks with the Diamondback. I was able to read far-away letters more clearly with the Diamondback. I thought I could see a bit more detail on starlings at a distance with the Diamondback. Overall, the Diamondback provided a clearer, more detailed image than the Yosemite. Both seemed to me to have good sharpness from the center to the edge.
Winner: Vortex Diamondback
Chromatic Aberration:
Both binoculars showed a similar amount of CA, small but noticeable.
Winner: Tie
Glare Control:
The Diamondback produces a noticeable veiling glare in low light when looking at dark objects, but only at certain angles. I did not test the Yosemite much, but found no glare when looking at the same object at the same time that I found glare in the Diamondback.
Winner: Leupold Yosemite
Summary:
The Vortex Diamondback has better build quality, resolution, and brightness, and is the better binocular. Both binoculars are very good quality for their low price. Is the Diamondback worth $100 more than the Yosemite? Absolutely yes. Is the Yosemite worth its price? Absolutely yes. The Yosemite has been discontinued by Leupold, so new samples will run out eventually. It all comes down to how much one is willing to spend. I will always recommend the Diamondback, but the Yosemite is a solid choice for someone who doesn't want to shell out the extra cash.