What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Multimedia
Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD
A brand new Bird Identification Guide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Cantelo" data-source="post: 1528860" data-attributes="member: 2844"><p>I've never been impressed by photo-guides largely for the reasons expressed by Jurek. However, despite his sensible caveats, this one looks as though it might be the first to give more conventional guides a run for their money. For me the plate of Red-necked Phalarope and that of Wilson's Petrel are the most impressive - perhaps because there's less 'interference' from the background. I found the 'red eye' in some of the owl shots off putting. I'm not convinced either by the book's proclaimed maxim of "proportional representation" so that rare birds get less space. I'd prefer a field guide that gave more space on the basis of difficulty of ID/variability of species rather than how common they are. It's when you find something outside your experience that you need the detail! I wonder too about how bulky it will be given that commoner species appear to have a plate each.</p><p></p><p>Even so I'm very much looking forward to this book's arrival - particularly given the author/photographer's apparent involvement in the excellent Shorebirds guide,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Cantelo, post: 1528860, member: 2844"] I've never been impressed by photo-guides largely for the reasons expressed by Jurek. However, despite his sensible caveats, this one looks as though it might be the first to give more conventional guides a run for their money. For me the plate of Red-necked Phalarope and that of Wilson's Petrel are the most impressive - perhaps because there's less 'interference' from the background. I found the 'red eye' in some of the owl shots off putting. I'm not convinced either by the book's proclaimed maxim of "proportional representation" so that rare birds get less space. I'd prefer a field guide that gave more space on the basis of difficulty of ID/variability of species rather than how common they are. It's when you find something outside your experience that you need the detail! I wonder too about how bulky it will be given that commoner species appear to have a plate each. Even so I'm very much looking forward to this book's arrival - particularly given the author/photographer's apparent involvement in the excellent Shorebirds guide, [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Multimedia
Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD
A brand new Bird Identification Guide
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top