What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Wildlife Art
A new scope for sketching
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="solitaryVSong" data-source="post: 1608743" data-attributes="member: 77930"><p>Thanks all for your comments so far!</p><p></p><p>Tim, I have nothing against optiphiles, so I'm happy to see your detailed response<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />. I can easily see where I could become one as well, if weren't for the money part of the equation. In any case thanks for your full report on the fully equipped bird artist! That will be my eventual ideal.</p><p></p><p>Speaking of fully equipped I used to carry an extra very cheap pair of binos in my car that wasn't worth much more than the binos (an '87 Chevette). That car was broken into over and over again. During one of those robberies (a pleasure of living in a big city as I do) someone made off with the cheap binos. So I've been hesitant to put another pair in the car and leave them there. I really think that's more superstition than anything else.</p><p></p><p>One thing I don't have any doubt about is the need for an angled scope. I actually tried my 60mm Fieldscope that I was wrongly sent today and was amazed at how much lower I had to set the tripod in order to use it. All in all my guess is that will also be a small plus.</p><p></p><p>I do think that an 82mm will be off in the distant future for me. It just sounds like it is too heavy, regardless of brand, to not be a pain to carry for most people.</p><p></p><p>So in a way that gets me back to my original decision: should I go for the ultralite ED50, similar to the Mighty Midget that Tim mentions I think, or should I split the difference between it and an 82mm by keeping the 60m, or buying another 60mm in a different brand, e.g. Kowa, as some have suggested in the Scopes forum?</p><p></p><p>I know, I know. It's all personal. But thanks for your thoughts anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="solitaryVSong, post: 1608743, member: 77930"] Thanks all for your comments so far! Tim, I have nothing against optiphiles, so I'm happy to see your detailed response;). I can easily see where I could become one as well, if weren't for the money part of the equation. In any case thanks for your full report on the fully equipped bird artist! That will be my eventual ideal. Speaking of fully equipped I used to carry an extra very cheap pair of binos in my car that wasn't worth much more than the binos (an '87 Chevette). That car was broken into over and over again. During one of those robberies (a pleasure of living in a big city as I do) someone made off with the cheap binos. So I've been hesitant to put another pair in the car and leave them there. I really think that's more superstition than anything else. One thing I don't have any doubt about is the need for an angled scope. I actually tried my 60mm Fieldscope that I was wrongly sent today and was amazed at how much lower I had to set the tripod in order to use it. All in all my guess is that will also be a small plus. I do think that an 82mm will be off in the distant future for me. It just sounds like it is too heavy, regardless of brand, to not be a pain to carry for most people. So in a way that gets me back to my original decision: should I go for the ultralite ED50, similar to the Mighty Midget that Tim mentions I think, or should I split the difference between it and an 82mm by keeping the 60m, or buying another 60mm in a different brand, e.g. Kowa, as some have suggested in the Scopes forum? I know, I know. It's all personal. But thanks for your thoughts anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Wildlife Art
A new scope for sketching
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top