What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
A strange move by Canon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tjsimonsen" data-source="post: 1466977" data-attributes="member: 38764"><p>Well, I have never used a 20/30D. But I went from 350D to 40D, and from what I have read the 350D is very similar to the 20D in image quality. In my uninformed opinion the 40D is head and shoulders above the 350D in terms of IQ: the colors are much, much better, the pictures seems smoother, and the high ISO is much better on the 40D, with the noise levels of 800 ISO being comparable to 400 ISO on the 350D. Interestingly, when the 40D arrived and a lot of people went from 30D to 40D, I saw almost exactly the same comments here on BF - if you replace 350D with 30D in my comments above...</p><p></p><p>Thomas</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tjsimonsen, post: 1466977, member: 38764"] Well, I have never used a 20/30D. But I went from 350D to 40D, and from what I have read the 350D is very similar to the 20D in image quality. In my uninformed opinion the 40D is head and shoulders above the 350D in terms of IQ: the colors are much, much better, the pictures seems smoother, and the high ISO is much better on the 40D, with the noise levels of 800 ISO being comparable to 400 ISO on the 350D. Interestingly, when the 40D arrived and a lot of people went from 30D to 40D, I saw almost exactly the same comments here on BF - if you replace 350D with 30D in my comments above... Thomas [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
A strange move by Canon
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top