What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
A thread to discuss Alphas where all opinions are considered equal.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3498261" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>John,</p><p></p><p>If I was constructing a 'Frankenbin' out of current Alphas then certainly the 'clarity' of the HT would be a must have. Whether it comes from A-K prisms, Pergers, or Porro II's, that 'clarity' is something that only a 100% internally reflecting prism can deliver - even the mighty SV doesn't have it, despite its wonderful ' crystalline' quality to the view. The Wow of the 10x50 SV notwithstanding, I think the 'clarity' of the 8x42 HT is about the best I've seen. It certainly is more neutral in its colour rendition than the ever so slightly cream tint to the view of the Swift Audubon 8.5x44 ED, or more life like than the strangely 2D flat view of Canon's IS bins ....</p><p></p><p>Having said that, I could not get along with the ergonomics, and it's weird hands forward cheat sheet positioning of the focuser, to say nothing of its porky weight, and what I find to be the slightly cartoonish quality to the view with its lack of micro-contrast and detail. That's why nothing absolutely compels me - everything annoyingly has some compromise. Compromises too far for me - come on the 9x50 SF with HT glass, Perger prisms, and lightweight CFRP chassis ...... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>However if the HT 'fits' you, it certainly has more pluses than minuses and would make a fine sole bin even. The added benefit is that if you are ever attacked by a wild animal while out birding you should easily be able protect yourself and bludgeon it to death with the unnecessarily heavy magnesium frame!</p><p></p><p>Go on -- get one! :t:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3498261, member: 92780"] John, If I was constructing a 'Frankenbin' out of current Alphas then certainly the 'clarity' of the HT would be a must have. Whether it comes from A-K prisms, Pergers, or Porro II's, that 'clarity' is something that only a 100% internally reflecting prism can deliver - even the mighty SV doesn't have it, despite its wonderful ' crystalline' quality to the view. The Wow of the 10x50 SV notwithstanding, I think the 'clarity' of the 8x42 HT is about the best I've seen. It certainly is more neutral in its colour rendition than the ever so slightly cream tint to the view of the Swift Audubon 8.5x44 ED, or more life like than the strangely 2D flat view of Canon's IS bins .... Having said that, I could not get along with the ergonomics, and it's weird hands forward cheat sheet positioning of the focuser, to say nothing of its porky weight, and what I find to be the slightly cartoonish quality to the view with its lack of micro-contrast and detail. That's why nothing absolutely compels me - everything annoyingly has some compromise. Compromises too far for me - come on the 9x50 SF with HT glass, Perger prisms, and lightweight CFRP chassis ...... :) However if the HT 'fits' you, it certainly has more pluses than minuses and would make a fine sole bin even. The added benefit is that if you are ever attacked by a wild animal while out birding you should easily be able protect yourself and bludgeon it to death with the unnecessarily heavy magnesium frame! Go on -- get one! :t: Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
A thread to discuss Alphas where all opinions are considered equal.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top