Hi guys!
I've been glancing this forum for a few months, as I've been on the market for some optics! Now I hope for some input from you!
In short:
I want a nice, good compact binocular, for casual use. I prioritize it being 'small enough to bring along easily', and good eye relief for use with glasses.
Strolling around this forum, especially two binos stand out to me: Zeiss VP 8x25 and Opticron Traveller 8x32.
My understanding is:
The Zeiss is more compact and better image quality, while the Opticron is cheaper and more comfortable to use, especially with glasses (longer ER)
But.. how much do these points actually "weigh" against each other? Does the extra eye relief of the opticron even make a difference? For jacket pocketability, does the slightly smaller size of the Zeiss even matter, or is Opticron already nearly as small? How much more comfortable is the Opticron to view through?
Any other thoughts for a first-time bino purchaser? (And hopefully one-time purchase!)
Thanks in advance!!
Some more info, for the avid reader:
I am not a dedicated birder, at all. I just spend a lot of time in nature, especially after Corona. I recently acquired a 8x25 monocular from Hawke (endurance ED), to keep in my jacket. The new bino should complement the monocular.
I do own an old 8x42 nikon porro bino, but it is so huge that I never bring it along.
Maximum packability is not top priority (I always have the monocular in my jacket anyway), but still important. Being able to bring the bino in a jacket pocket would be a huuuge plus, if not required, and would make me use the bino lot more often.
I intially thought of a ~200€ budget.. but the more I studied, the higher my budget went! First I thought of the Opticron Savannah or Bresser Pirsch, for their nice eye reliefs - but they were quite large, compared to the Opticron Traveller, which I was aiming for afterwards. Then I stumbled upon the Zeiss VP 8x25 reviews.
If the Zeiss VP 8x25 is 'nearly' as nice to use as the Opticron Traveller.. I will go for that Zeiss. But if the Opticron basically folds to the same size in the pocket, AND is more comfortable to use.. then I'll get the Opticron!
For info, the Hawke Endurance ED 8x25 Monocular that I own, has about 13 mm eye relief.Just placing it on my glasses, I get ~80% of the full view, is a bit fiddly, and that works 'ok'. But I need to press my glasses into my face to get the best/easiest view. And that only works due it being a mono, as my glasses 'pivot' around my nose, causing my glasses to get further from the other eye.
This is going to be my "one" binocular, so I'd prefer not to feel like a compromize (though I understand everything is a compromize...)
I have been tipping towards the Zeiss VP lately, as I've been assuming the eye relief is enough, and lots of people here comment it being great with glasses, and easy to use.
But some also state that it is horrible in actual use, and that a 8x32 is much nicer - and then que me, a confused newbie!!
PS a few photos taken through the monocular yesterday on my way home from work on the bicycle - at around 100-150m distance.
In danish they are called Skarv and Vibe.
PS I have a 3D printer, so the lack of lensguards etc (for the Zeiss) would be a non-issue, as I can just print my own in a flexible material
I've been glancing this forum for a few months, as I've been on the market for some optics! Now I hope for some input from you!
In short:
I want a nice, good compact binocular, for casual use. I prioritize it being 'small enough to bring along easily', and good eye relief for use with glasses.
Strolling around this forum, especially two binos stand out to me: Zeiss VP 8x25 and Opticron Traveller 8x32.
My understanding is:
The Zeiss is more compact and better image quality, while the Opticron is cheaper and more comfortable to use, especially with glasses (longer ER)
But.. how much do these points actually "weigh" against each other? Does the extra eye relief of the opticron even make a difference? For jacket pocketability, does the slightly smaller size of the Zeiss even matter, or is Opticron already nearly as small? How much more comfortable is the Opticron to view through?
Any other thoughts for a first-time bino purchaser? (And hopefully one-time purchase!)
Thanks in advance!!
Some more info, for the avid reader:
I am not a dedicated birder, at all. I just spend a lot of time in nature, especially after Corona. I recently acquired a 8x25 monocular from Hawke (endurance ED), to keep in my jacket. The new bino should complement the monocular.
I do own an old 8x42 nikon porro bino, but it is so huge that I never bring it along.
Maximum packability is not top priority (I always have the monocular in my jacket anyway), but still important. Being able to bring the bino in a jacket pocket would be a huuuge plus, if not required, and would make me use the bino lot more often.
I intially thought of a ~200€ budget.. but the more I studied, the higher my budget went! First I thought of the Opticron Savannah or Bresser Pirsch, for their nice eye reliefs - but they were quite large, compared to the Opticron Traveller, which I was aiming for afterwards. Then I stumbled upon the Zeiss VP 8x25 reviews.
If the Zeiss VP 8x25 is 'nearly' as nice to use as the Opticron Traveller.. I will go for that Zeiss. But if the Opticron basically folds to the same size in the pocket, AND is more comfortable to use.. then I'll get the Opticron!
For info, the Hawke Endurance ED 8x25 Monocular that I own, has about 13 mm eye relief.Just placing it on my glasses, I get ~80% of the full view, is a bit fiddly, and that works 'ok'. But I need to press my glasses into my face to get the best/easiest view. And that only works due it being a mono, as my glasses 'pivot' around my nose, causing my glasses to get further from the other eye.
This is going to be my "one" binocular, so I'd prefer not to feel like a compromize (though I understand everything is a compromize...)
I have been tipping towards the Zeiss VP lately, as I've been assuming the eye relief is enough, and lots of people here comment it being great with glasses, and easy to use.
But some also state that it is horrible in actual use, and that a 8x32 is much nicer - and then que me, a confused newbie!!
PS a few photos taken through the monocular yesterday on my way home from work on the bicycle - at around 100-150m distance.
In danish they are called Skarv and Vibe.
PS I have a 3D printer, so the lack of lensguards etc (for the Zeiss) would be a non-issue, as I can just print my own in a flexible material