What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Micro Four Thirds 4/3 Photography
Advice on best camera/lens combo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jim M." data-source="post: 3480801" data-attributes="member: 60675"><p>Both the panasonic 100-400 and the Olympus 300mm f4 have in-lens stabilization that works in tandem with stabilization of the newer bodies of their respective brands to provide even better stabilization. So if you go with one of those lenses having a body from the same manufacturer is an advantage. I have both those lenses and don't find either too heavy to carry for long periods with a shoulder strap--though the panasonic is noticeably lighter and occasionally I need to switch shoulders with the Olympus because of slight muscle fatigue. The extra reach (requires the teleconverter for the Olympus) is defintely helpful for bird photography vs. the 300mm zooms. And both are better optically at the long end.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jim M., post: 3480801, member: 60675"] Both the panasonic 100-400 and the Olympus 300mm f4 have in-lens stabilization that works in tandem with stabilization of the newer bodies of their respective brands to provide even better stabilization. So if you go with one of those lenses having a body from the same manufacturer is an advantage. I have both those lenses and don't find either too heavy to carry for long periods with a shoulder strap--though the panasonic is noticeably lighter and occasionally I need to switch shoulders with the Olympus because of slight muscle fatigue. The extra reach (requires the teleconverter for the Olympus) is defintely helpful for bird photography vs. the 300mm zooms. And both are better optically at the long end. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Micro Four Thirds 4/3 Photography
Advice on best camera/lens combo
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top