What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Micro Four Thirds 4/3 Photography
Advice on best camera/lens combo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jim M." data-source="post: 3481297" data-attributes="member: 60675"><p>I have not done formal tests, so not sure how useful my comments will be.</p><p></p><p>I probably would have just bought the Panasonic/Leica zoom, but I wound up with both because I was going on a trip and only the Olympus was available at the time. I had never used a prime telephoto lens before, and decided after the trip that without a zoom I was going to be missing some shots in key situations. My practice now is to generally stick with the Olympus, but switch to the zoom when I am viewing wildlife from a vehicle (e.g. boat or car), or when I expect animals to be close, or large animals to be at medium-range, such as around a lodge where they are accustomed to people. The specs of the Olympus with teleconverter also make it slightly preferable when you are at a distance--40mm more reach and slightly wider aperture.</p><p></p><p>My impression is that the image quality between the two is quite close. I think in ideal conditions the Olympus is going to give you more of a “wow factor” in terms of being tack sharp and contrasty, but I've been very happy with the results from the Panasonic as well.</p><p></p><p>As for focusing, I seem to have a problem with getting the Olympus to autofocus when my camera wakes up from sleep mode, e.g. sometimes I have to resort to firing off a shot before it will focus. Not sure if this is a problem with my camera or my settings or the lens. I have not noticed a big difference in autofocus between the two lenses otherwise, except that, obviously, birds in flight are easier to acquire in the viewfinder if you can be zoomed out first. I seem to have mis-focus problems with both lenses similar to what I had with the 100-300 mm Panasonic, which was my previous zoom lens. But I find these easier to correct on the Olympus because I can switch to manual focus simply by sliding the focus ring on the camera forward; the zoom has a switch near the base of the lens which is harder to find when you are looking at a bird.</p><p></p><p>As for speed, I typically use the teleconverter with the Olympus, so it is at F5.6. (I find the extra reach more beneficial than a somewhat wider aperture). Inside rainforest, I try to take advantage of the dual image stabilization by switching to much lower shutter speeds than I used to use, even down to 1/30. I find shooting with burst mode you can usually get a decent shot of even a fast moving bird at slower shutter speeds, since almost all birds pause briefly when moving. I take a similar approach with the Panasonic, but do not push the shutter speed quite so low because I do not have the dual image stabilization on my camera for that lens. If I go on night walks where I anticipate taking photos of spotlighted animals, I will remove the teleconverter and take advantage of the faster lens.</p><p></p><p>Hope this helps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jim M., post: 3481297, member: 60675"] I have not done formal tests, so not sure how useful my comments will be. I probably would have just bought the Panasonic/Leica zoom, but I wound up with both because I was going on a trip and only the Olympus was available at the time. I had never used a prime telephoto lens before, and decided after the trip that without a zoom I was going to be missing some shots in key situations. My practice now is to generally stick with the Olympus, but switch to the zoom when I am viewing wildlife from a vehicle (e.g. boat or car), or when I expect animals to be close, or large animals to be at medium-range, such as around a lodge where they are accustomed to people. The specs of the Olympus with teleconverter also make it slightly preferable when you are at a distance--40mm more reach and slightly wider aperture. My impression is that the image quality between the two is quite close. I think in ideal conditions the Olympus is going to give you more of a “wow factor” in terms of being tack sharp and contrasty, but I've been very happy with the results from the Panasonic as well. As for focusing, I seem to have a problem with getting the Olympus to autofocus when my camera wakes up from sleep mode, e.g. sometimes I have to resort to firing off a shot before it will focus. Not sure if this is a problem with my camera or my settings or the lens. I have not noticed a big difference in autofocus between the two lenses otherwise, except that, obviously, birds in flight are easier to acquire in the viewfinder if you can be zoomed out first. I seem to have mis-focus problems with both lenses similar to what I had with the 100-300 mm Panasonic, which was my previous zoom lens. But I find these easier to correct on the Olympus because I can switch to manual focus simply by sliding the focus ring on the camera forward; the zoom has a switch near the base of the lens which is harder to find when you are looking at a bird. As for speed, I typically use the teleconverter with the Olympus, so it is at F5.6. (I find the extra reach more beneficial than a somewhat wider aperture). Inside rainforest, I try to take advantage of the dual image stabilization by switching to much lower shutter speeds than I used to use, even down to 1/30. I find shooting with burst mode you can usually get a decent shot of even a fast moving bird at slower shutter speeds, since almost all birds pause briefly when moving. I take a similar approach with the Panasonic, but do not push the shutter speed quite so low because I do not have the dual image stabilization on my camera for that lens. If I go on night walks where I anticipate taking photos of spotlighted animals, I will remove the teleconverter and take advantage of the faster lens. Hope this helps. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Micro Four Thirds 4/3 Photography
Advice on best camera/lens combo
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top