What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Micro Four Thirds 4/3 Photography
Advice on best camera/lens combo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dalat" data-source="post: 3481304" data-attributes="member: 65207"><p>Thanks Jim, Niels and Mike, that helps a lot!</p><p></p><p>As I'm coming from a cheap bridge camera and am not yet used to the hefty prices of better photo gear, of course budget is an issue and therefore makes me look at the panasonic kit first. However, if I'd then feel soon the need to further upgrade to the Oly 300, going for the cheaper pana kit would be a waste of money then as well. However, from what you say, the risk seems not to be that big.</p><p></p><p>I'm mainly a birder not a photographer, but have come to like the record shots and occasional nice pics from my FZ200, which however has it's obviously limits in speed and IQ. So I think about something better, but don't want to give up too much on the portability of the bridge. I don't feel much need for a zoom, as I see myself taking pics almost always at the long end of the bridge...</p><p></p><p>So what I take from your comments is that the 100-400 is very usuable, including in low light situations. Also it would be worthwhile to wait for the new bodies to be out and used, to know what they can do (fine, I'm not in a hurry anyway).</p><p></p><p>Thanks again!</p><p>Florian</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dalat, post: 3481304, member: 65207"] Thanks Jim, Niels and Mike, that helps a lot! As I'm coming from a cheap bridge camera and am not yet used to the hefty prices of better photo gear, of course budget is an issue and therefore makes me look at the panasonic kit first. However, if I'd then feel soon the need to further upgrade to the Oly 300, going for the cheaper pana kit would be a waste of money then as well. However, from what you say, the risk seems not to be that big. I'm mainly a birder not a photographer, but have come to like the record shots and occasional nice pics from my FZ200, which however has it's obviously limits in speed and IQ. So I think about something better, but don't want to give up too much on the portability of the bridge. I don't feel much need for a zoom, as I see myself taking pics almost always at the long end of the bridge... So what I take from your comments is that the 100-400 is very usuable, including in low light situations. Also it would be worthwhile to wait for the new bodies to be out and used, to know what they can do (fine, I'm not in a hurry anyway). Thanks again! Florian [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Micro Four Thirds 4/3 Photography
Advice on best camera/lens combo
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top