What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Aerc Tac
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Acrocephalus" data-source="post: 1893297" data-attributes="member: 54391"><p><strong>Paridae</strong></p><p></p><p>Hi,</p><p></p><p>I understand that the breakdown of the Genus <em>Parus </em>to many genera by Gill <em>et al</em>. 2005, (The Auk 122(1):121-143), was followed by the majority of the taxonomic comities worldwide (with a few exceptions like Birdlife). I see that AERC Tac did not follow this treatment neither in 2003 nor now. </p><p> </p><p>Who is from the 5 AERC’s TCs who still does not follow yet the new taxonomic treatment of Gill et al. 2005? I know that BOURC-TSC and CSNA have already followed Gill et al. 2005, but the CAF does not (up to 2007, the latest CAF checklist I think), but I don’t know about the Swedish TC and German TC.</p><p></p><p>We know that the AERC Tac decisions are based on votes, and from above I can see already 2 votes <em>vs</em>. 1 in the this matter. Could someone shed some light on this? Sorry if I missed something and thanks in advance.</p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Mohamed</p><p></p><p>p.s. I am not connected via my ordinary computer and no permanent internet connection in the moment, so in most cases I won’t be able to follow discussion in time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Acrocephalus, post: 1893297, member: 54391"] [b]Paridae[/b] Hi, I understand that the breakdown of the Genus [I]Parus [/I]to many genera by Gill [I]et al[/I]. 2005, (The Auk 122(1):121-143), was followed by the majority of the taxonomic comities worldwide (with a few exceptions like Birdlife). I see that AERC Tac did not follow this treatment neither in 2003 nor now. Who is from the 5 AERC’s TCs who still does not follow yet the new taxonomic treatment of Gill et al. 2005? I know that BOURC-TSC and CSNA have already followed Gill et al. 2005, but the CAF does not (up to 2007, the latest CAF checklist I think), but I don’t know about the Swedish TC and German TC. We know that the AERC Tac decisions are based on votes, and from above I can see already 2 votes [I]vs[/I]. 1 in the this matter. Could someone shed some light on this? Sorry if I missed something and thanks in advance. Regards, Mohamed p.s. I am not connected via my ordinary computer and no permanent internet connection in the moment, so in most cases I won’t be able to follow discussion in time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Aerc Tac
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top