BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fugl" data-source="post: 3535651" data-attributes="member: 816">Way too strong a condemnation. The probability cited, while certainly not in itself "proving" anything, is congruent with the masses of other evidence for AGW, and there's nothing in the article to suggest a stronger claim is being made for it.The world is heating up, a phenomenon to which a growing consensus of scientists ascribes in part, at least, to human activities.  A few skeptics dispute human involvement.  So, given this state of affairs and what appears to be the extreme urgency of the problem, what do you suggest we do with respect to carbon emissions?  Nothing at all, just merrily continue to pollute away in hopes that the mavericks are right and the scientific consensus is wrong?  I recall asking this question of you in another thread long ago. You didn't answer it then but I'm hoping you will now.</blockquote>