Alaudidae (1 Viewer)

[Maffong]

A new genus is clearly, obviously , mandatory needed for Eremopterix hova

From a quick glance at the figures, E. australis would need then a new genus too.

I don't think anything is mandatory in this case, even though it may be merited for whatever reasons.
For some reason it kinda bugs me, that often you tend to emphasize your personal preferences with strong terminology like the above, when this is only a matter of preference and no clear rules exist.
I always have to check whether current classification is truly erroneous or if it's just that it doesn't sit right with you. I would prefer it, if you could use more appropriate terms, like 'in my view', or 'I would prefer, if'. Would that be alright?

Cheers
Maffong

 

[Jim LeNomenclatoriste]

From a quick glance at the figures, E. australis would need then a new genus too.

Don't worry for that, there is one genus available for it since 19th century 😛