It could well be. Howell & Zufelt suggest that ID of these plumages are usually based on range, but perhaps there's a diagnostic feature. I guess Snowy would be the most likely on range, but these birds do get around!It looks to me like what they call in the new Argentina guide Tristan, Diomedes exulans antipodensis, adult male?
I went off the amount of white in the wings, the extent of the dark terminal band on the tail, and the blocky shape of the head.How does one exclude immature southern royal albatross?
Dark tail tip is the most glaring feature.How does one exclude immature southern royal albatross?
Also present to some degree in immature southern royal albatross from what I've read.Dark tail tip is the most glaring feature.
Not illustrated in the new Argentina field guide?Also present to some degree in immature southern royal albatross from what I've read.
Another feature which 'should' be visible on this shot, is the dark, cutting edge to the bill of S-R.How does one exclude immature southern royal albatross?
(Some) black on tail of southern royal albatross is shown, and described, in Argentina FG. Also Pizzey Australia FG shows lots of black on tail of southern royal albatross. I've not looked further.Not illustrated in the new Argentina field guide?
Ditto assuming/hoping.The new Seabird book will be out soon, that should be definitive I hope.
O, crikey, no - that's really narrow and difficult to see - nothing like as obvious as in Argentina FG paintings. Even in close-up head-shots you're left wondering if it's just the shadow of the edge of the upper mandible.Another feature which 'should' be visible on this shot, is the dark, cutting edge to the bill of S-R.
Images such as this, make me think it should be visible, it also makes me wonder how many images are wrongly identified on Google.O, crikey, no - that's really narrow and difficult to see - nothing like as obvious as in Argentina FG paintings. Even in close-up head-shots you're left wondering if it's just the shadow of the edge of the upper mandible.
...and in the field - given that most people are probably keener to get wandering albatross on their lists than southern royal albatross.makes me wonder how many images are wrongly identified on Google
It looks to me like what they call in the new Argentina guide Tristan, Diomedes exulans antipodensis, adult male?
It could well be. Howell & Zufelt suggest that ID of these plumages are usually based on range, but perhaps there's a diagnostic feature. I guess Snowy would be the most likely on range, but these birds do get around!
How does one exclude immature southern royal albatross?
Indeed, though this would be very much at the most extensive end for dark tail in a Southern RoyalAlso present to some degree in immature southern royal albatross from what I've read.