BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chris Monk" data-source="post: 871341" data-attributes="member: 133">Sea eagle set to soar again in SuffolkSea eagle set to soar again in SuffolkLast updated at 12:49pm on 25th April 2007<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...770&ito" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...770&ito</a> =1490The biggest bird of prey could be setting up home in Suffolk as part of an ambitious re-introduction programme. The sea - or white-tailed - eagle was successfully reintroduced into the west of Scotland in the 1990s when a handful of immature birds were released in the region. There are now 33 breeding pairs centred on the Isle of Mull and along the west coast - and they have proved to be a huge tourist attraction. The sea eagle is slowly being reintroduced to EnglandThe majestic bird had been hunted to extinction in this country during the early years of last century by sheep farmers and estates worried the birds would take their stock. But it survived in Scandinavia and Russia and the birds were reintroduced to Scotland from Norway. Now government conservation body Natural England is considering re-introducing sea eagles to parts of England and the Suffolk coast has been identified as a possible location. The sea eagle has a wingspan of up to eight feet and is the fourth largest eagle in the world. Its natural food is fish or smaller mammals like rabbits but it will also take carrion and birds on the ground. Natural England is consulting conservation bodies like the RSPB and Suffolk farmers before re-introducing the bird, which died out in this region during Victorian times. But farmers and conservationists fear the eagles could take farm animals like lambs, free-range chickens and turkeys if they are re-introduced to Suffolk - and could even be a threat to other endangered species like marsh harriers, otters, and water voles. Natural England spokeswoman Helen Payne said: "There is still no final decision on whether we will go ahead with this programme. It is very much a long-term plan but it could be good for the area. "We shall be consulting people over the summer and that would mean no final decision will be made during this breeding season." Unlike its near relative the golden eagle, the sea eagle is not known as a shy bird. It can live quite happily alongside humans. On the Continent sea eagle nests are often found in small harbours with adult birds scouring the sea for waste left by fishing vessels. Ian Barthorpe, of the RSPB, said: "This is a project led by Natural England and they are still at the very early pre-consultation stage. "No decision is likely to be made until 2008 at the earliest. "There is no reason why white-tailed eagles should not do well in Suffolk, but they will have to consider the impact on other species and the environment as a whole. "In Suffolk we would expect them to eat mainly carrion but also rabbits and fish - they have adapted to following fishing vessels to look for scraps. Sea Eagle Factfile: • There are about 6,000 pairs of sea eagles in northern Europe. • Last year 33 pairs raised young in Scotland. • They weigh up to 5.5kg. • The cost of re-introducing them to Suffolk has been estimated at about £150,000. • In Scotland the presence of sea eagles is estimated to attract £1.5 million a year from tourists. • The sea eagle is not endangered globally - its numbers are rising in Europe and over the last few years it has established new colonies in Denmark, Poland, and the Baltic states. Share this article:What is this?Digg it | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Nowpublic Add your comment Comments (3)Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below? No, this is a bad idea. One recently carried off a cat and it would not be beyond them to carry off a baby. Look at other areas where species have been re-introduced and are now having to be culled. Where possible nature should be allowed to take it's course, if they move from Scotland or Europe so be it but otherwise we should stay out.- Col, Co AntrimIan millard, you took the words out of my mouth.- Clive Lowe, CheshireGood news. Pay no heed to farmers, they are only interested in exploiting the countryside for money and are subsidized to the hilt, most of them.- Ian Millard, Exeter UK</blockquote>

Verification