Looking at the numbers of votes in your poll to date, and taking into account the number of users on BF who have outed themselves as Canon 10*42 converts, it would appear that votes for this model could potentially match or eclipse the 3 votes for HTs or Noctivid respectively, or the 4 votes for EDGs. Even though they are a single binocular model only, while the others are all "families" of bins.Also the Canon isn't really a widespread alpha. I'm not disputing its quality, but it isn't in widespread use.
"They are not regarded as Alpha optics" - by whom? You left that out making your statement universal. The beauty of passive constructions.Canon is a camera company primarily, along with their professional optics, office, copiers, etc.,. Their binocular sales are very small, it is just a token
part of their business. They are not regarded as Alpha optics.
Canon is a camera company primarily, along with their professional optics, office, copiers, etc.,. Their binocular sales are very small, it is just a token
part of their business.
Jerry
bockos: "I apologize for the translation. but the new Swarovski 8x42NL Pure is very sharp, clear, transparent .. wide, easy view .. very contrasting on the horizon .. vivid colors, 3D .. Stable with FRP ... just no other binoculars are so stable .. With proper [?] I put on my glasses, looked close to the sun ... there was no glare ... very nice binoculars."Извинявам се за превода. но новият Swarovski 8x42NL Pure е много остър, ясен, прозрачен .. широк, леко гледащ .. много контрастен на хоризонта .. живи цветове, 3D .. Стабилен с FRP ... просто никой друг бинокъл не е толкова стабилен .. С правилно поставих очила, погледнах близо до слънцето ... нямаше отблясъци .. много хубав бинокъл.
You put my thoughts on this into words. The "Other" option is for those less popular binoculars. If BirdForum would let me put more than 10 options, I would put the Canons (and some others) in.4 the birds1, I would not get all bent about this poll. It is obvious that you enjoy your Canons, and that is great, however what I have learned from this forum is - it does not reflect opinions of the large users of optics world wide.
Thanks very much for the kind words of support. On the whole, I am feeling alright.4 the birds1, I would not get all bent about this poll. It is obvious that you enjoy your Canons, and that is great, however what I have learned from this forum is - it does not reflect opinions of the large users of optics world wide.
I agree 100%. That's why this poll is useless for anything except personal curiosity. All the alphas have different qualities, so it all comes down to personal preference. That's why looking through binoculars before you buy is so important.I voted Victory SF, but if I could vote for TWO choices, they would be Victory SF and Ultravid HD Plus. I would actually rank them pretty much equal, in my experience - each having some qualities that the other doesn't have. Neither is clearly "better" - they're just different.
That said... there are many awesome choices and favorites pretty much come down to preferences and different people just have different preferences. There is no "one" winner in this race.... there are numerous winners, regardless of how the poll numbers turn out.
Right on, qwerty5!I agree 100%. That's why this poll is useless for anything except personal curiosity. All the alphas have different qualities, so it all comes down to personal preference. That's why looking through binoculars before you buy is so important.
I voted Victory SF, but if I could vote for TWO choices, they would be Victory SF and Ultravid HD Plus. I would actually rank them pretty much equal, in my experience - each having some qualities that the other doesn't have. Neither is clearly "better" - they're just different.
That said... there are many awesome choices and favorites pretty much come down to preferences and different people just have different preferences. There is no "one" winner in this race.... there are numerous winners, regardless of how the poll numbers turn out.