What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Alpha Spectacles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="looksharp65" data-source="post: 3380229" data-attributes="member: 83771"><p>First, allow me to doubt the 0.02% reflection rate of the Swarotop. The figure seems highly unlikely to me. Unfortunately I don't have access to any numbers, but I recall learning that a high-grade multicoating has 99.8% transmission, which means that a finished lens has 0.998^2, e.g. 99.6% transmission.</p><p>Although the light reflected from the surfaces may appear to have a distinct colour, and this wavelength is subtracted from the beam pencil going through the lens, it does very little to change the perceived colour bias as long as it's only two surfaces. Frankly, it is totally negligible. The residual reflection is made to keep within a very narrow wavelength range but maybe not quite monochromatic.</p><p>Thus it may seem fairly bright although the actual light loss is kept at a low level.</p><p>But since it's green light they're reflecting, they are <em>not</em> optimized for maximum green light transmission, they are optimized for everything else but green.</p><p></p><p>You also ask why mineral (silicate) lenses are "clearer", which is the better question. The transparency of the lenses will decidedly affect your perceived view much more than the properties of the multicoatings.</p><p></p><p>With your spectacle powers, the only reasonable high-index plastic lens is 1.74, and the high refractive index is reached by adding various substances to the polymer mix.</p><p>These chemicals reduce the transmission rate, and the finished lenses may look like they are tinted, especially on photos.</p><p>The high-index mineral lenses (1.7 and 1.8 at least) don't appear as brownish as the plastic, but I wouldn't bet on that. Things develop rapidly and the plastic lenses generally get better while the mineral lenses don't develop.</p><p>The transmission rates are available from the lens manufacturers and the optician should be able to provide them. </p><p>Best-case scenario is if transmission diagrams are available.</p><p></p><p>//L</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="looksharp65, post: 3380229, member: 83771"] First, allow me to doubt the 0.02% reflection rate of the Swarotop. The figure seems highly unlikely to me. Unfortunately I don't have access to any numbers, but I recall learning that a high-grade multicoating has 99.8% transmission, which means that a finished lens has 0.998^2, e.g. 99.6% transmission. Although the light reflected from the surfaces may appear to have a distinct colour, and this wavelength is subtracted from the beam pencil going through the lens, it does very little to change the perceived colour bias as long as it's only two surfaces. Frankly, it is totally negligible. The residual reflection is made to keep within a very narrow wavelength range but maybe not quite monochromatic. Thus it may seem fairly bright although the actual light loss is kept at a low level. But since it's green light they're reflecting, they are [I]not[/I] optimized for maximum green light transmission, they are optimized for everything else but green. You also ask why mineral (silicate) lenses are "clearer", which is the better question. The transparency of the lenses will decidedly affect your perceived view much more than the properties of the multicoatings. With your spectacle powers, the only reasonable high-index plastic lens is 1.74, and the high refractive index is reached by adding various substances to the polymer mix. These chemicals reduce the transmission rate, and the finished lenses may look like they are tinted, especially on photos. The high-index mineral lenses (1.7 and 1.8 at least) don't appear as brownish as the plastic, but I wouldn't bet on that. Things develop rapidly and the plastic lenses generally get better while the mineral lenses don't develop. The transmission rates are available from the lens manufacturers and the optician should be able to provide them. Best-case scenario is if transmission diagrams are available. //L [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Alpha Spectacles
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top