• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Alternative tripod adapter for Swarovski slc 15x56. (1 Viewer)

Marleymac

Member
Please can anyone recommend an alternative tripod adapter that will fit my Swarovski slc 15x56 and also my hawke frontier edx 10x42, the both have 1/4 inch thread. I have listed below some possible adapters, thanks.

Below are possible compatible adapters -

Benro Arca Compatible Binocular Bracket​

Hawke Tripod Mount​

Celestron RSR binocular tripod adapter​

 
I like a flat mount support better than the center post style, because they offer a more stable platform.
There are 2 that I have. There is the Bogpod mount, good for roof prism binoculars of all sizes, and the Berlebach
wooden mount that can also be used for porro prism binoculars.
This question was raised recently on another forum, and it seems it is hard to find the Berlebach in the US these days.
Good luckl.
Jerry
 
I like a flat mount support better than the center post style, because they offer a more stable platform.
There are 2 that I have. There is the Bogpod mount, good for roof prism binoculars of all sizes, and the Berlebach
wooden mount that can also be used for porro prism binoculars.
This question was raised recently on another forum, and it seems it is hard to find the Berlebach in the US these days.
Good luckl.
Jerry
Cheers for that, but I'm in the uk, if I could find a cheaper alternative great, if not I'll have to get the Swarovski mount, the cheapest I have found in the uk is £113 😮
 
The Swaro one works very well (although it isn't cheap). Swaro did send me an extra stud for free though so I cn also mount my 7x50 SLCs.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top