What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Angled vs. straight-through EP on spotting scopes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Kerreran" data-source="post: 1464195" data-attributes="member: 56970"><p>I have a straight Nikon ED82 - for me holding my head at an angle for any length of time = neck pain. I chose and use the scope primarily for observing from a fixed position for periods of time - mostly seawatching, waders, and waterbirds - and find it does the job very nicely [the big zoom is very good for this, but that's another discussion! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> ]. It was my first proper scope, and I partially chose straight as I knew I'd have trouble getting on stuff [I'd tried out a few scopes and realised just how big a difference it makes being able to point straight at a moving bird, rather than line up with a sighter, then look and find you're already off-target]. Another advantage of straight not yet mentioned is being able to look down on things [from a hilltop/cliff etc.] much more easily.</p><p>I also have an ED50, which is straight too, and is my 'mobility scope'. I don't even use a tripod with it - either in the Grippa case in the top of my rucksack when walking, or on a shoulderpod for close terrain - great for treetop warblers! Again the straight helps with handheld, as you can pretty much look down it [though the eyepiece is slightly offset, its easy to compensate]. A factor with the ED50 is that due to the different prisms the straight body transmits a few % more light than the angled [I'm waiting to be corrected here, aren't I?], but I'm sure that's not the case with all scopes [again awaiting correction!].</p><p>After babbling on, I'm going to conclude with the famous birding optics cliche - try out both, and see what works best for you, and what you want to do with your scope.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Kerreran, post: 1464195, member: 56970"] I have a straight Nikon ED82 - for me holding my head at an angle for any length of time = neck pain. I chose and use the scope primarily for observing from a fixed position for periods of time - mostly seawatching, waders, and waterbirds - and find it does the job very nicely [the big zoom is very good for this, but that's another discussion! ;) ]. It was my first proper scope, and I partially chose straight as I knew I'd have trouble getting on stuff [I'd tried out a few scopes and realised just how big a difference it makes being able to point straight at a moving bird, rather than line up with a sighter, then look and find you're already off-target]. Another advantage of straight not yet mentioned is being able to look down on things [from a hilltop/cliff etc.] much more easily. I also have an ED50, which is straight too, and is my 'mobility scope'. I don't even use a tripod with it - either in the Grippa case in the top of my rucksack when walking, or on a shoulderpod for close terrain - great for treetop warblers! Again the straight helps with handheld, as you can pretty much look down it [though the eyepiece is slightly offset, its easy to compensate]. A factor with the ED50 is that due to the different prisms the straight body transmits a few % more light than the angled [I'm waiting to be corrected here, aren't I?], but I'm sure that's not the case with all scopes [again awaiting correction!]. After babbling on, I'm going to conclude with the famous birding optics cliche - try out both, and see what works best for you, and what you want to do with your scope. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Angled vs. straight-through EP on spotting scopes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top