What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Anybody bored with near-identical B-species?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alexjh1" data-source="post: 3496705" data-attributes="member: 85555"><p>I kind of take the opposite approach - if something is on any half-reputable list I count it for my own sake, but keep aware of what contentious things are on there for the occasions where direct 1-1 comparison might be needed.</p><p></p><p>My Eastern and Western Cattle Egrets for instance may not fly (no pun intended) with a bunch of lists, but at best I have two species and at worst two subspecies, and as I don't bird competitively it ultimately doesn't particularly matter.</p><p></p><p>The only real problem I've run into with this approach is when lists change their minds about species and revoke them back to subspecies, but then that's going to be an issue with going with a single list anyway. Glad I never got around to counting Black-eared Kite for instance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alexjh1, post: 3496705, member: 85555"] I kind of take the opposite approach - if something is on any half-reputable list I count it for my own sake, but keep aware of what contentious things are on there for the occasions where direct 1-1 comparison might be needed. My Eastern and Western Cattle Egrets for instance may not fly (no pun intended) with a bunch of lists, but at best I have two species and at worst two subspecies, and as I don't bird competitively it ultimately doesn't particularly matter. The only real problem I've run into with this approach is when lists change their minds about species and revoke them back to subspecies, but then that's going to be an issue with going with a single list anyway. Glad I never got around to counting Black-eared Kite for instance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Anybody bored with near-identical B-species?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top