What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Anybody bored with near-identical B-species?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mysticete" data-source="post: 3496762" data-attributes="member: 67784"><p>As someone who follows Herpetology, I can certainly vouch that the BSC has been almost completely abandoned in reptiles and amphibians. My guess is that the same follows for fish and invertebrates. Mammals I think BSC is still heavily used, but even that depends varies by specific group.</p><p></p><p>BSC is currently by far the most accepted and widespread species concept in Ornithology, but I would say that Ornithology is fairly unique. Birds in general are just really really easy to study using the concept, as most species use species recognition methods that are easy to observe and amendable to human observation (visual displays and sound). They also are generally pretty good at dispersal, which means that populations tend to be more fluid and thus there is more secondary contact and "need" to develop reproductive isolating mechanisms.</p><p></p><p>Reproductive isolation is almost impossible to directly study in most other groups, either because it's not really very feasible to to observe taxa in the wild, because some senses such as smell that might be important in species discrimination for some groups are hard to identify.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mysticete, post: 3496762, member: 67784"] As someone who follows Herpetology, I can certainly vouch that the BSC has been almost completely abandoned in reptiles and amphibians. My guess is that the same follows for fish and invertebrates. Mammals I think BSC is still heavily used, but even that depends varies by specific group. BSC is currently by far the most accepted and widespread species concept in Ornithology, but I would say that Ornithology is fairly unique. Birds in general are just really really easy to study using the concept, as most species use species recognition methods that are easy to observe and amendable to human observation (visual displays and sound). They also are generally pretty good at dispersal, which means that populations tend to be more fluid and thus there is more secondary contact and "need" to develop reproductive isolating mechanisms. Reproductive isolation is almost impossible to directly study in most other groups, either because it's not really very feasible to to observe taxa in the wild, because some senses such as smell that might be important in species discrimination for some groups are hard to identify. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Anybody bored with near-identical B-species?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top