What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2009
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mysticete" data-source="post: 1559254" data-attributes="member: 67784"><p>anyone want to place bets on which of these will be split and which will not</p><p></p><p>My guess is Pacific Wren will be a sure thing</p><p></p><p>Woodhouse's and Sumichrast Scrub-Jays I doubt will be split, since only one gene was sampled and the AOU prefers other data being brought into species proposals, i.e. playback experiments, hybridization studies, etc. The only way I think this split will be accepted is to accommodate the Island Scrub-Jay situation, and if it is split I think Woodhouse's may be split and Sumichrast will not be.</p><p></p><p>South Hills Crossbill could go either way. The evidence is good that they should be treated as a different species, even under BSC. I can see it not going through though on the reasoning that AOU might want to deal with the Crossbill situation all at once, and not piece meal. I think a lot of taxonomists are quite scared of dealing with Crossbill, and with good reason! I also wonder if this would go through how the ABA will treat it. Fea's and Zino's are currently treated as different species but the same "tick" based on difficulty to ID. I can see the Red Crossbills group being treated the same way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mysticete, post: 1559254, member: 67784"] anyone want to place bets on which of these will be split and which will not My guess is Pacific Wren will be a sure thing Woodhouse's and Sumichrast Scrub-Jays I doubt will be split, since only one gene was sampled and the AOU prefers other data being brought into species proposals, i.e. playback experiments, hybridization studies, etc. The only way I think this split will be accepted is to accommodate the Island Scrub-Jay situation, and if it is split I think Woodhouse's may be split and Sumichrast will not be. South Hills Crossbill could go either way. The evidence is good that they should be treated as a different species, even under BSC. I can see it not going through though on the reasoning that AOU might want to deal with the Crossbill situation all at once, and not piece meal. I think a lot of taxonomists are quite scared of dealing with Crossbill, and with good reason! I also wonder if this would go through how the ABA will treat it. Fea's and Zino's are currently treated as different species but the same "tick" based on difficulty to ID. I can see the Red Crossbills group being treated the same way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2009
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top