What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2009
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mysticete" data-source="post: 1559334" data-attributes="member: 67784"><p>Woodhouse's and Sumichrasts are sister taxa, so if not split completely sumichrasts would probably be included within Woodhouse's. </p><p></p><p>I actually have come to appreciate the cautious nature of AOU, especially compared to taxonomic bodies like CNAH (which covers NA herps). Sure it means splits take longer, but avoids a lot of the fickle genera assignment and splits that occur.</p><p></p><p>As far as AOU goes, yes it does cover Panama and everything north. I don't think you could really though find a smooth place to separate AOU and SACC. You are bound to have overlap somewhere. The AOU boundaries seem appropriate. Interestingly, there has been a lot of editorials and commentary about changing the ABA area (currently Canada, AK, and the lower 48 states), and expand them to include anywhere up to all of the current AOU area. No idea if this is just editorializing or something that they plan on having the next version of the checklist incorporate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mysticete, post: 1559334, member: 67784"] Woodhouse's and Sumichrasts are sister taxa, so if not split completely sumichrasts would probably be included within Woodhouse's. I actually have come to appreciate the cautious nature of AOU, especially compared to taxonomic bodies like CNAH (which covers NA herps). Sure it means splits take longer, but avoids a lot of the fickle genera assignment and splits that occur. As far as AOU goes, yes it does cover Panama and everything north. I don't think you could really though find a smooth place to separate AOU and SACC. You are bound to have overlap somewhere. The AOU boundaries seem appropriate. Interestingly, there has been a lot of editorials and commentary about changing the ABA area (currently Canada, AK, and the lower 48 states), and expand them to include anywhere up to all of the current AOU area. No idea if this is just editorializing or something that they plan on having the next version of the checklist incorporate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2009
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top