What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 3342466" data-attributes="member: 24811"><p>Swifts have long been classified together with swallows; even quite late in the 19th C, many a classification had these as two subfamilies within the same family.</p><p>Additionally:</p><p>- The use of order names in -iformes is a quite recent convention (eg., the <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/37764644" target="_blank">3rd ed. of the AOU check-list</a> (1910) had them in an order Macrochires (the "large hands", not formed from a generic name; together with "goatsuckers" and hummers), suborder Cypseli (formed from <em>Cypselus</em> Illiger 1811, from Greek κύψελος, a swallow)).</p><p>- The generic name <em>Apus</em> Scopoli 1777 (from Greek ἄπους, footless, and also a swallow) has long been regarded preoccupied by <em>Apos</em> Scopoli 1777, and its generalised use is recent (eg., the <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/5823937" target="_blank">4th ed. of the AOU check-list</a> (1931) had them in an order Micropodiformes, formed from <em>Micropus</em> Meyer & Wolf 1810 ("small foot") which, back then, was the generic name used for what we now call <em>Apus</em>).</p><p>---</p><p>(Edit: some of this is already written by Peter above, then...)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="l_raty, post: 3342466, member: 24811"] Swifts have long been classified together with swallows; even quite late in the 19th C, many a classification had these as two subfamilies within the same family. Additionally: - The use of order names in -iformes is a quite recent convention (eg., the [URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/37764644"]3rd ed. of the AOU check-list[/URL] (1910) had them in an order Macrochires (the "large hands", not formed from a generic name; together with "goatsuckers" and hummers), suborder Cypseli (formed from [I]Cypselus[/I] Illiger 1811, from Greek κύψελος, a swallow)). - The generic name [I]Apus[/I] Scopoli 1777 (from Greek ἄπους, footless, and also a swallow) has long been regarded preoccupied by [I]Apos[/I] Scopoli 1777, and its generalised use is recent (eg., the [URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/5823937"]4th ed. of the AOU check-list[/URL] (1931) had them in an order Micropodiformes, formed from [I]Micropus[/I] Meyer & Wolf 1810 ("small foot") which, back then, was the generic name used for what we now call [I]Apus[/I]). --- (Edit: some of this is already written by Peter above, then...) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2016
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top