What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 3343365" data-attributes="member: 24811"><p>There used to be a wide understanding that the same classical word could not be used in two names, even if the transcription (ie, the spelling) differed. (No such rule exists nowadays of course. Generic names that differ in a single letter are not homonyms. For specific names, it's a bit more complex.)</p><p>Additionally, under <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11269400" target="_blank"><em>Apos</em> S<span style="font-size: 9px">COP</span>.</a>, Scopoli cited sources that had used "<em>Apus</em>" ("M<span style="font-size: 9px">ONOCULUS</span> <em>Apus</em> Linn.", Schaeffer's <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=2u5AAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA18&q=Apus#v=snippet&q=Apus&f=false" target="_blank"><em>Der fischförmische Kiefenfuß</em></a>). And Cuvier (<a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27238526" target="_blank">1798</a> and <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/49450" target="_blank">1800</a>) subsequently turned the name into <em>Apus</em>.</p><p></p><p>Many of the <em>Apus</em> and <em>Micropus</em> were placed on the <a href="http://iczn.org/sites/iczn.org/files/officialists.pdf" target="_blank">Official List / Index</a> as a result of <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34986784" target="_blank">Opinion 502</a>.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k53618f/f406" target="_blank"><em>Apus</em></a> in Pierre Bellon's <em>L'histoire de la nature des oyseaux</em> (1555) is the swift. <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11269479" target="_blank"><em>Apus</em></a> was attributed to Bellon by Scopoli 1777, hence "<em>Apus</em> ex Bellon". Of course Bellon is pre-Linnean; thus, for nomenclature purposes, the author of the name is Scopoli.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="l_raty, post: 3343365, member: 24811"] There used to be a wide understanding that the same classical word could not be used in two names, even if the transcription (ie, the spelling) differed. (No such rule exists nowadays of course. Generic names that differ in a single letter are not homonyms. For specific names, it's a bit more complex.) Additionally, under [URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11269400"][I]Apos[/I] S[SIZE="1"]COP[/SIZE].[/URL], Scopoli cited sources that had used "[I]Apus[/I]" ("M[SIZE="1"]ONOCULUS[/SIZE] [I]Apus[/I] Linn.", Schaeffer's [URL="https://books.google.com/books?id=2u5AAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA18&q=Apus#v=snippet&q=Apus&f=false"][I]Der fischförmische Kiefenfuß[/I][/URL]). And Cuvier ([URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27238526"]1798[/URL] and [URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/49450"]1800[/URL]) subsequently turned the name into [I]Apus[/I]. Many of the [I]Apus[/I] and [I]Micropus[/I] were placed on the [URL="http://iczn.org/sites/iczn.org/files/officialists.pdf"]Official List / Index[/URL] as a result of [URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34986784"]Opinion 502[/URL]. [URL="http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k53618f/f406"][I]Apus[/I][/URL] in Pierre Bellon's [I]L'histoire de la nature des oyseaux[/I] (1555) is the swift. [URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11269479"][I]Apus[/I][/URL] was attributed to Bellon by Scopoli 1777, hence "[I]Apus[/I] ex Bellon". Of course Bellon is pre-Linnean; thus, for nomenclature purposes, the author of the name is Scopoli. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2016
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top