What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul Clapham" data-source="post: 3367516" data-attributes="member: 101256"><p>I don't think it's such a bad thing to have a committee of experts who review the taxonomy of species found in an area such as North America, which roughly corresponds to the Nearctic ecozone. Makers of a world taxonomy would then consider the output of such a committee, rather than repeating their work.</p><p></p><p>Which is of course what happens now. On the other hand a committee of experts who review taxonomy in a small area such as Britain is much less useful, since its work unnecessarily duplicates the work of similar committees elsewhere in the Western Palearctic, as you say. This is certainly a place for European unity -- in my opinion anyway, so I'm not sad to see the BOU TSC disappear.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul Clapham, post: 3367516, member: 101256"] I don't think it's such a bad thing to have a committee of experts who review the taxonomy of species found in an area such as North America, which roughly corresponds to the Nearctic ecozone. Makers of a world taxonomy would then consider the output of such a committee, rather than repeating their work. Which is of course what happens now. On the other hand a committee of experts who review taxonomy in a small area such as Britain is much less useful, since its work unnecessarily duplicates the work of similar committees elsewhere in the Western Palearctic, as you say. This is certainly a place for European unity -- in my opinion anyway, so I'm not sad to see the BOU TSC disappear. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2016
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top