What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 3372203" data-attributes="member: 24811"><p>OK, thanks Mark -- this one was on my to-do list, but I had not checked it yet indeed.</p><p>The author of this work is Hermann Goebel, not Schrenk or Brandt, however. (See the title page [<a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=LTYYAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA219" target="_blank">here</a>]. For those without access (it's US-only on Google), there is also a scanned <em>Neudruck</em> (dated 1969) that can be read [<a href="https://archive.org/stream/beitrgezurkenntn13akad#page/n239/mode/2up" target="_blank">here</a>].)</p><p></p><p>Then it must be:</p><p></p><p>Plectrophanidae Goebel 1879; type genus <em>Plectrophanes</em> Meyer 1815; type species, by original monotypy, <em>Fringilla calcarata</em> Pallas 1773.</p><p>OS: Plectrophanidae</p><p>OR: family</p><p>OD: Goebel H. 1879. Die Vögel des Kreises Uman, Gouvernement Kiew, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf ihre Zugverhältnisse und ihr Brutgeschäft. Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Russischen Reiches und der angrenzenden Länder Asiens. Zweite Folge, Band II. Kais. Akad. Wiss., St. Petersburg.</p><p>link to OD: <a href="https://archive.org/stream/beitrgezurkenntn13akad#page/n329/mode/1up" target="_blank">https://archive.org/stream/beitrgezurkenntn13akad#page/n329/mode/1up</a> (p.88)</p><p>link to OD of type genus: <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46138817" target="_blank">http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46138817</a> (p.xii)</p><p>link to OD of type species of type genus: <a href="http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms...N=PPN330046632" target="_blank">http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms...N=PPN330046632</a> (physical pp.344 & 413)</p><p>Notes: Bock 1994: "Pletrophenacinae", <em>errore pro</em> Plectrophaneae Olphe-Galliard 1890:4; stirps; Olphe-Galliard L. 1890. Contributions à la faune ornithologique de l'Europe occidentale. Fascicule XXXI. Emberizidae. Pitrat Aîné, Lyon; R Friedlander und Sohn, Berlin.; <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44637251" target="_blank">http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44637251</a> ; subsequent use. The type genus <u>IS NOT</u> <em>Plectrophenax </em>Stejn.! (<em>Plectrophenax</em> is explicitly treated as invalid by O-G.) O-G cited the type genus from Meyer 1822, but this is a subsequent use; Goebel gave no authority.</p><p></p><p>I've updated my file. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> (But this changes nothing to how Calcariidae should be called.)</p><p></p><p>No other new family-group names appear to be introduced in this work. (At least not unless you would be willing to regard <a href="https://archive.org/stream/beitrgezurkenntn13akad#page/n342/mode/1up" target="_blank">Humicolidae</a> [not listed by Bock, and a problematic case for various reasons] as available from here.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="l_raty, post: 3372203, member: 24811"] OK, thanks Mark -- this one was on my to-do list, but I had not checked it yet indeed. The author of this work is Hermann Goebel, not Schrenk or Brandt, however. (See the title page [[URL="https://books.google.com/books?id=LTYYAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA219"]here[/URL]]. For those without access (it's US-only on Google), there is also a scanned [I]Neudruck[/I] (dated 1969) that can be read [[URL="https://archive.org/stream/beitrgezurkenntn13akad#page/n239/mode/2up"]here[/URL]].) Then it must be: Plectrophanidae Goebel 1879; type genus [I]Plectrophanes[/I] Meyer 1815; type species, by original monotypy, [I]Fringilla calcarata[/I] Pallas 1773. OS: Plectrophanidae OR: family OD: Goebel H. 1879. Die Vögel des Kreises Uman, Gouvernement Kiew, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf ihre Zugverhältnisse und ihr Brutgeschäft. Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Russischen Reiches und der angrenzenden Länder Asiens. Zweite Folge, Band II. Kais. Akad. Wiss., St. Petersburg. link to OD: [url]https://archive.org/stream/beitrgezurkenntn13akad#page/n329/mode/1up[/url] (p.88) link to OD of type genus: [url]http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46138817[/url] (p.xii) link to OD of type species of type genus: [url]http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms...N=PPN330046632[/url] (physical pp.344 & 413) Notes: Bock 1994: "Pletrophenacinae", [I]errore pro[/I] Plectrophaneae Olphe-Galliard 1890:4; stirps; Olphe-Galliard L. 1890. Contributions à la faune ornithologique de l'Europe occidentale. Fascicule XXXI. Emberizidae. Pitrat Aîné, Lyon; R Friedlander und Sohn, Berlin.; [url]http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44637251[/url] ; subsequent use. The type genus [U]IS NOT[/U] [I]Plectrophenax [/I]Stejn.! ([I]Plectrophenax[/I] is explicitly treated as invalid by O-G.) O-G cited the type genus from Meyer 1822, but this is a subsequent use; Goebel gave no authority. I've updated my file. ;) (But this changes nothing to how Calcariidae should be called.) No other new family-group names appear to be introduced in this work. (At least not unless you would be willing to regard [URL="https://archive.org/stream/beitrgezurkenntn13akad#page/n342/mode/1up"]Humicolidae[/URL] [not listed by Bock, and a problematic case for various reasons] as available from here.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU-NACC Proposals 2016
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
