What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU vs ABA established non native birds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard Klim" data-source="post: 2929333" data-attributes="member: 773"><p><strong>FL exotics</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>Morgan, I'm not suggesting that delisting should be either premature or easy. But there are two very different cases...</p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The FL state list currently includes at least three exotic species that apparently never satisfied FOSRC's acceptance criteria (White-winged Parakeet, Red-whiskered Bulbul, Spot-breasted Oriole). I'm suggesting that these should be (exceptionally) delisted to establish a consistent baseline. Although it might be mildly annoying for those birders (including me!) who have wandered the streets of Kendall for the dubious pleasure of adding them to their ABA Area lists, it's surely logical to apply the same acceptance criteria to all exotics on the state list, challenging questionable historical decisions rather than treating them as commandments inscribed on tablets of stone. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /><br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Where formerly-established populations of exotic species have subsequently declined to a level where they no longer satisfy FOSRC's acceptance criteria (eg, Budgerigar), they should nevertheless remain on the state list (as per recently-extinct native species, eg, Passenger Pigeon, Carolina Parakeet, Ivory-billed Woodpecker, Bachman's Warbler). In Britain, such species (so far, only Lady Amherst's Pheasant) are permanently retained on the list but are labelled as 'Category C6' (former naturalized species whose naturalized populations are either no longer self-sustaining or considered extinct).</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard Klim, post: 2929333, member: 773"] [b]FL exotics[/b] Morgan, I'm not suggesting that delisting should be either premature or easy. But there are two very different cases... [LIST=1] [*]The FL state list currently includes at least three exotic species that apparently never satisfied FOSRC's acceptance criteria (White-winged Parakeet, Red-whiskered Bulbul, Spot-breasted Oriole). I'm suggesting that these should be (exceptionally) delisted to establish a consistent baseline. Although it might be mildly annoying for those birders (including me!) who have wandered the streets of Kendall for the dubious pleasure of adding them to their ABA Area lists, it's surely logical to apply the same acceptance criteria to all exotics on the state list, challenging questionable historical decisions rather than treating them as commandments inscribed on tablets of stone. ;) [*]Where formerly-established populations of exotic species have subsequently declined to a level where they no longer satisfy FOSRC's acceptance criteria (eg, Budgerigar), they should nevertheless remain on the state list (as per recently-extinct native species, eg, Passenger Pigeon, Carolina Parakeet, Ivory-billed Woodpecker, Bachman's Warbler). In Britain, such species (so far, only Lady Amherst's Pheasant) are permanently retained on the list but are labelled as 'Category C6' (former naturalized species whose naturalized populations are either no longer self-sustaining or considered extinct). [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
AOU vs ABA established non native birds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top