What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Arctic sea ice extent '2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MJB" data-source="post: 3494642" data-attributes="member: 88928"><p>Would you be so kind as to cite the peer-reviewed literature that:</p><p></p><p>a. Backs up your claim that thousands of scientists put forward the case for global cooling in the 1970s?</p><p></p><p>b. By published audits, argues that the worldwide scam (as you put it) involving at least 300,000 scientists in over 50 disciplines (and at least 197 scientific institutes worldwide) has been the greatest conspiracy since the 'Moon landings were faked' conspiracy?</p><p></p><p>Thanking you in anticipation,</p><p>MJB</p><p>PS I have participated in the odd literature trawl of scientific papers in the past and would be keen to learn any new aspects, especially about the the quality of the apparent large majority of peer-reviewed climate-related papers published in the 1970s that predicted that the increasing amount of greenhouse gases being released into the atmosphere would tend to increase temperatures globally.</p><p>PPS Unsupported assertions don't count, nor do anecdotes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MJB, post: 3494642, member: 88928"] Would you be so kind as to cite the peer-reviewed literature that: a. Backs up your claim that thousands of scientists put forward the case for global cooling in the 1970s? b. By published audits, argues that the worldwide scam (as you put it) involving at least 300,000 scientists in over 50 disciplines (and at least 197 scientific institutes worldwide) has been the greatest conspiracy since the 'Moon landings were faked' conspiracy? Thanking you in anticipation, MJB PS I have participated in the odd literature trawl of scientific papers in the past and would be keen to learn any new aspects, especially about the the quality of the apparent large majority of peer-reviewed climate-related papers published in the 1970s that predicted that the increasing amount of greenhouse gases being released into the atmosphere would tend to increase temperatures globally. PPS Unsupported assertions don't count, nor do anecdotes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Arctic sea ice extent '2016
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top