What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Are 1960s & 70s glasses worth the money?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 1468570" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>Well, I'm not of the opinion that it was ever their "best model," but we might agree to disagree. 7x35s were quite common; the 8.5x44s were an innovation at the time. </p><p></p><p>The B&L Zephyr of the late 50s that I'm familiar with had a knurled black focusing wheel that differed from the Neptune's, which is faceted—as well as its EPs. Those were made by Tamron in the late 50s. Do you see a Japanese makers mark? If not it's Tamron. Otherwise Hiyoshi Kogaku. (I think you have a Tamron product.)</p><p></p><p>The objectives of my Audubons of that era are marked Quintar (Type-0a) or Ultrar (Type-0b), apparently the difference being coated vs. fully coated. The Type-1c made by Hiyoshi in the later 60s is also marked Ultrar. As was typical for the Type-2 models of the 1980s, my Neptune says "U.V. Coating. Amber Coated Optics." </p><p></p><p>When Swift introduced the smaller body 804R in 1985, it also introduced multicoating. My 1988 Neptune, however, did not have that feature so the image is inferior in contrast and brightness. With the advent of full multicoating in the HR/5 there was no longer a valid comparison, and Swift apparently discontinued its stalwart Neptune without further improvement.</p><p></p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 1468570, member: 14473"] Well, I'm not of the opinion that it was ever their "best model," but we might agree to disagree. 7x35s were quite common; the 8.5x44s were an innovation at the time. The B&L Zephyr of the late 50s that I'm familiar with had a knurled black focusing wheel that differed from the Neptune's, which is faceted—as well as its EPs. Those were made by Tamron in the late 50s. Do you see a Japanese makers mark? If not it's Tamron. Otherwise Hiyoshi Kogaku. (I think you have a Tamron product.) The objectives of my Audubons of that era are marked Quintar (Type-0a) or Ultrar (Type-0b), apparently the difference being coated vs. fully coated. The Type-1c made by Hiyoshi in the later 60s is also marked Ultrar. As was typical for the Type-2 models of the 1980s, my Neptune says "U.V. Coating. Amber Coated Optics." When Swift introduced the smaller body 804R in 1985, it also introduced multicoating. My 1988 Neptune, however, did not have that feature so the image is inferior in contrast and brightness. With the advent of full multicoating in the HR/5 there was no longer a valid comparison, and Swift apparently discontinued its stalwart Neptune without further improvement. Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Are 1960s & 70s glasses worth the money?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top