Gullplague, would you answer my question? Are you a creationist? Feel free to reply in any font size.
I don't know if you are familiar with Stephen Hawking, the famous physicist who is still alive despite an illness that should have taken him decades ago?
He and I and a few thousand others all believe in the Big Bang theory of Creation. Hawking has suggested that all matter at its simplist level is made up of positive or negative energy pulses. In the beginning there was a sort of explosion that sent these charges hurtling in all directions. The universe was without form and resembled a sort of "mist." Then along came one of the most complex mathematical formulas known to man that Isaac Newton described as gravity. Gravity gave form to everything we know, it shaped the Cosmos and defined the planets, their orbits and their characteristics.
We do not know when the Big Bang occured and Hawking suggest that it was sudden and of such enormous energy that the positive and negative pulses could easily have spread in a very short space of time.
That is how the universe was created. How wil be it be "uncreated" as all energy winds down according to the laws of physics (entropic degradation). Hawking suggests, and I think he is right, that the positive and negative pulses dissappear at the entrances to the very many "black holes" that occur throughout the universe. The matter is sucked into the holes and we do not know where the energy goes. Hawking also believes, and again I think he is right, that all of the universe will one day dissappear as quickly as it was created with the positive cancelling out the negative at the threshold of a massive black hole.
The problem that we have is what gave the creative agency of the universe the code to "write" the formula for gravity as it is too precise and too complex for a random set sequencing result. The Hadron Collider in Switzerland is attempting to find the Higgs Boson's particle that some have dubbed the " God Particle" because it is the agent that gave the Universe form after the Big bang.
That take us to life. What formula created the first life? Obviously gravity did as matter could not come together to form life without it. Life could not have derived from random sets because mathematics does not allow for random patterns to form formulas without intervention of a higher mathematical set. The law of physics that applies here is, simply put, complexity demands an object of higher complexity to give the lower form it's existence. Thus, a bridge demands the existence of a bridge builder.
DNA is, at its basest form, a mathematical formula akin to gravity but with a different outcome. The study of genes and the sequencing that occurs in the formation of life is based on a "binary system" to give life its form. There is a switch that turns off or on (binary) to give differentiation. This is why the closest relative to man, chromosome-wise, is a rat and not a chimpanzee. The reason why a chimp is a chimp and a rat is a rat is based on mathematics--or how growth was determiend by the binary code written into DNA. On this count, Darwin was wrong because he believed differention was environmentally caused. Darwin did not know about DNA and he was not a physicists and would not have understood binary sequencing.
When the binary code in DNA goes wrong or the sequencing loses it timing, you get mutation. Cancer, a common form of mutation, results when the switch remains on for too long and cells grow in unplanned patterns.
The reasonthe cell was possible was because the binary formula allowed for the simulatanoues development of the epidermins and mitochondria. YOu cannot have the basic building block of life without both being in place. It is all down to the DNA, the mathematacical formula that writes the code in DNA and its "parent" gravity.
Bottom line: I think Hawking has almost cracked it. The Universe began with a big bang and was followed by a complex mathematical formula that gave form to all that we see. The universe is conditional as matter is conditional being a delicate balance of postive and negative charges. The only question that is left unanswered may never be discovered as it is what lies behind big bang and how did gravity come to be written. The Greek philosphers suggested it was the "First Cause" and that infinite regression was illogical. However, this ducks the question as First Cause must be defined and linked to what it caused and how the "what" is related to the cause. This is where you get into the mystical where physics and religion merge.
So do I believe in Creationism? Of course--the universe is here and it was created or it does not exist. Hawking is right on the big bang IMHO and we started form nothing (or that which exists when positive cancels out negative) and will revert to nothing in due course as matter is conditional upon gravity and gravity must, if the laws ofphysics apply, wind down into chaos and it is at that point big bang will reverse, perhaps as quickly as it began.
Hope that answers the question.