What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Astroscope + DSLR = Gallery!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DanC.Licks" data-source="post: 2979951" data-attributes="member: 111263"><p>I picked up a good used 5D MkII "tank" last fall thinking that it would be far superior to the E-M1 in terms of noise etc. I isn't! It is more disturbing, blotchier, and only slightly better at higher ISO settings. E-M1 noise is very fine grained and far less obtrusive. In spite of its great AF (compared to Oly) I sold it. FF is not for me, unless someday I get a big white monster, which doesn't seem likely. Then I would get a 5DIII, or the 7D II if it ever makes it onto the market. I bought a D7100+80-300 VR for the same money as the Canon body, which I will get tomorrow. I expect it to be somewhat better than the E-M1 in terms of noise and DR, with roughly the same resolution (pixel pitch) and it will give me a chance to really compare the 7100 with the E-M1 on the scope. I am very curious about that. The EVF sometimes drives me crazy and I often feel the disadvantages out-weigh the advantages. </p><p>FF is not for us!....unless you want to carry the extra weight and have a 3" focuser etc.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DanC.Licks, post: 2979951, member: 111263"] I picked up a good used 5D MkII "tank" last fall thinking that it would be far superior to the E-M1 in terms of noise etc. I isn't! It is more disturbing, blotchier, and only slightly better at higher ISO settings. E-M1 noise is very fine grained and far less obtrusive. In spite of its great AF (compared to Oly) I sold it. FF is not for me, unless someday I get a big white monster, which doesn't seem likely. Then I would get a 5DIII, or the 7D II if it ever makes it onto the market. I bought a D7100+80-300 VR for the same money as the Canon body, which I will get tomorrow. I expect it to be somewhat better than the E-M1 in terms of noise and DR, with roughly the same resolution (pixel pitch) and it will give me a chance to really compare the 7100 with the E-M1 on the scope. I am very curious about that. The EVF sometimes drives me crazy and I often feel the disadvantages out-weigh the advantages. FF is not for us!....unless you want to carry the extra weight and have a 3" focuser etc..... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Astroscope + DSLR = Gallery!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top