• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Athlon Optics Cronus 8.5x42 (1 Viewer)

FrankD

Well-known member
With all the love being thrown around lately I thought it an appropriate time to post my review of the new Athlon Optics Cronus 8.5x42.....

P.S. They just sent me three other new units...two spotting scopes and one of their mid-price binoculars. More to follow.....

I was given the opportunity to review the new Athlon Optics Cronus 8.5x42 binocular. For those that didn’t read my review of the Argos model, Athlon is a relatively new company staffed by a variety of individuals that had worked for Bushnell in recent years. These gentlemen had the idea that they could offer high quality optics directly to consumers at a very reasonable price. I was quite satisfied with what they were able to produce with the Argos lineup so I was curious what they could do with their flagship model.

Athlon Optics has 6 binocular lines and 2 spotting scope lines. Each line is geared for a specific level of performance for that particular price point. The Cronus offers all of the latest features. A list of them is below…..

E2ES System- Edge 2 Edge Sharpness system

E2ES System is a field flattening system that produces sharper, clearer images all the way from one lens edge to the other

ED Glass- High definition glass ED glass gives you an image with little or no chromatic fringe so the final result brings a clearer and sharper image to your eyes

ESP Dielectric Coating- Enhanced Spectral Prism Dielectric Coating ESP Dielectric Coating is a multi layer prism coating that reflects over 99% of the light to your eyes bringing you a clear, bright image that displays accurate color reproduction.

Lightweight Magnesium Chassis Magnesium chassis give you the strength of a metal chassis while reducing the weight as much as 35%

XPL Coating- Xtra Protective Layer coating XPL Coating gives you an extra protection on the exterior lenses from dirt, oil and scratches

Phase Corrected prisms Phase corrected prisms produce images that have better contrast, a higher resolution and better color reproduction

BaK4 prisms Bak-4 glass prisms reflect more light to your eyes which will give you brighter and sharper image.

Advanced FMC Advanced Fully Multi-Coated lenses gives you better light transmission to bring optimum brightness and true color across the entire light spectrum.

Locking Diopter Locking Diopter keeps the diopter adjustment knob from accidentally moving from the optimal setting

Long Eye Relief Long eye relief can be particularly important for eyeglass wearers because longer eye relief allows them to still see the entire field of view.

Close Focus Close focus is important for those who are nature observers and especially important if you are going to watch butterflies or insects

Twist Up Eyecups Twist up eyecups with intermediate stops allow you to set the eyecups to the ideal eye relief for you eyes

Waterproof Waterproof to protects the binocular in the harshest weather conditions or if accidentally submerged underwater

Argon Purged Argon purging gives you better waterproofing and thermal stability


Advertised specifications are as follows:

POWER 8.5X

OBJECTIVE LENS DIAMETER 42 mm

EYE RELIEF 22 mm

FIELD OF VIEW ANGULAR 7.6°

FIELD OF VIEW FEET @1000 Yards 399 ft

FIELD OF VIEW METERS @1000 METERS 133 m

CLOSE FOCUS 2 m /6.6 ft

INTERPUPILLARY DISTANCE 56 mm-73 mm

WEIGHT 33 oz


When reviewing these features what jumped out at me initially was the mention of a field flattening element in the design. For those of you that are familiar with the market the use of field flatteners, typically in the eyepiece, has been utilized for quite some time but only in certain models and never in any great variety. That seems to have changed over the last three or four years.

Several of these most recently introduced models appear to be based off the same basic design as they all sport practically identical performance parameters and specifications (eye relief, field of view, physical weight, etc…). The latest introduction into this market segment is the Athlon Cronus. In many ways it appears to be based off the same base design but with one notable difference. All of the other recent introductions are offered in an 8x42 and a 10x42. Athlon decided to spice things up a bit by offering their Cronus model in both a 10x42 and an 8.5x42.

So you might ask why an 8.5x model? Well, Swarovski, and Swift, have had considerable success with this magnification. 8.5x does provide just a little bit more potential resolution when all else is equal. I have owned the original Swarovski EL 8.5x42, a vintage Swift Audubon of this configuration and a Bresser Montana 8.5x45. In each case I could see just a bit more detail with these 8.5x models than I could with my old standby 8x binoculars. Furthermore, I do not seem to notice much of the negatives of jumping up to a 10x model in the sense of notable decreased depth of field or notably narrower field of view. 8.5x seems like a worthwhile compromise for those looking for just a little more “reach” than an 8x can provide. With that being said, let us take a look at the rest of this binoculars’ optical performance.

Optical Performance:

The use of ED glass in the objective design, the field flattener in the eyepiece and the eyepiece design in general produce a very bright, sharp, contrast-filled image that does come very close to edge to edge sharpness. It is better than average in all of these areas plus it has relatively low levels of chromatic aberration (color fringing). So, its performance basically mirrors that of the previous models built on this platform. Where it is slightly better is in the level of apparent sharpness on axis. I believe the extra .5x magnification does provide slightly more detail particularly in the center of the field of view. I can see the smallest details relatively easily with this model.

The only negative aspect of this binoculars’ optical performance is that it does suffer from slightly increased angular magnification distortion and the subsequent rolling ball as a result. The field of view is flat with excellent edge sharpness but the transition zone between the on axis and off axis performance is slightly larger than in the 8x versions and also slightly more pronounced. With a static image the distortion is practically unnoticeable but when panning I pick up on it relatively easily.

Apparent brightness is above average as is the contrast level. Color representation is neutral to ever so slightly warm.


Mechanics and Ergonomics:

The build quality on this binocular is very good. I had no concerns with the central hinge tension or eyecup design and function. Internally the binocular is extremely clean, well baffled and blackened. The focusing knob is a little stiffer than I would prefer right out of the box but has loosened up somewhat over the last month. The minimum close focusing distance for my eyes was measured at 5.75 feet. The focusing speed is fairly fast in going from close focus to infinity in just a hair over one full turn of the focus knob. The diopter adjustment is located on the focusing knob and has a small raised extension used for adjustments. It has a locking function that requires you to depress it before it will freely move from its set position.
Probably the only objectionable issue with this model, as it was with similar designs, is the physical weight. The manufacturer lists a 33 oz weight which I tend to believe though I haven’t had a chance to weigh the binocular myself. This is about 5 ounces heavier than the previous model I reviewed and I believe that the increase is the result of thicker rubber armor. Personally, I don’t have an issue with the weight as I have used heavier binoculars in the past (Nikon Venturer LXL 8x42 – 36 oz, Vixen Foresta 7x50 – 31 oz, Leica Trinovid BN – 31 oz, Meopta Meostar 8x42 – 32 oz) but it might be a consideration for some folks looking for a lightweight full-sized design.


Conclusion:

All in all this is another excellent introduction at/around $500. You receive all of the latest features available on models at a much more expensive price point. It sets itself apart from similarly designed models by offering an extra .5x magnification and a diopter adjustment on the central focusing knob. Build quality is very good and the binoculars are well balanced. Athlon definitely chose an excellent design to use as their flagship model.
 

Attachments

  • cronus1.jpg
    cronus1.jpg
    283.9 KB · Views: 582
  • Cronus2.jpg
    Cronus2.jpg
    231.7 KB · Views: 344
  • cronus3.jpg
    cronus3.jpg
    128.7 KB · Views: 684
  • cronus 5.jpg
    cronus 5.jpg
    130.3 KB · Views: 307
  • cronus7.jpg
    cronus7.jpg
    240.1 KB · Views: 571
Last edited:

FrankD

Well-known member
JG,

I am glad you asked that. I don't have time to fully expand at the moment but will chime in more later. The obvious answer is that they are both based off the same design...probably even down to the coatings. There are some noticeable differences in terms of "fit" and optical performance though.

Mark,

Thank you for the kind words.
 

birdrousta

Well-known member
frank, do you have a feel for how much focus past infinity these do? I recently picked up a set of +5 reading glasses out of curiosity. it seems that using them is a way to subtract about 5 diopters of focus travel at the infinite end. unfortunately I also wear glasses, so the eye relief requirement for me to use them with bins is brutal....
 

FrankD

Well-known member
Sorry for the delay in replying to all of these questions. Weekends I am typically busy either with my boys or out birding.

Birdousta,

I can check "past infinity" travel when I get home but, for now, from what I remember there was significant movement past infinity...at least half of a turn...but I will verify later.

JG, Chuck,

In my opinion, the Athlon and the Theron are basically the same binocular "underneath"...same family as the Zen Ray and the Leupold. It is in the subtle execution of the design where each differs from the other. I could easily see a person picking one model over the other, or vice versa, for a variety of reasons.

Visually, I get the impression that the Athlon's are ever so slightly sharper than any of the others, most likely because of the extra .5x magnification. The Therons have an easier overall view. The usuable eye relief on the Therons is a little more generous for my facial dimensions though I don't have a problem seeing the full field of view on the Athlons. Both of these new field flattener models do not have the eyecup diameter issues (for my face) of the Zen Rays or Leupolds.

Ergonomically I prefer the Therons. I like the smooth rubber armor and more pronounced thumb indents, plus the focusing knob is not as tight as the Athlons. Some folks would like the checkered armor of the Athlons because of the increased gripping surface.

Personally I would place both of these models over the Vanguard ED IIs in terms of image quality. They both have wider fields of view and larger sweet spots than the Vanguard but at the cost of a heavier weight.

FWIW, I loaned a pair of the Therons out to two forum members. Hopefully they will chime in on the Theron thread with their experiences. One comment already was that they don't have much competition until you start getting into the $1000+ club.
 

chill6x6

Well-known member
Sorry for the delay in replying to all of these questions. Weekends I am typically busy either with my boys or out birding.

Birdousta,

I can check "past infinity" travel when I get home but, for now, from what I remember there was significant movement past infinity...at least half of a turn...but I will verify later.

JG, Chuck,

In my opinion, the Athlon and the Theron are basically the same binocular "underneath"...same family as the Zen Ray and the Leupold. It is in the subtle execution of the design where each differs from the other. I could easily see a person picking one model over the other, or vice versa, for a variety of reasons.

Visually, I get the impression that the Athlon's are ever so slightly sharper than any of the others, most likely because of the extra .5x magnification. The Therons have an easier overall view. The usuable eye relief on the Therons is a little more generous for my facial dimensions though I don't have a problem seeing the full field of view on the Athlons. Both of these new field flattener models do not have the eyecup diameter issues (for my face) of the Zen Rays or Leupolds.

Ergonomically I prefer the Therons. I like the smooth rubber armor and more pronounced thumb indents, plus the focusing knob is not as tight as the Athlons. Some folks would like the checkered armor of the Athlons because of the increased gripping surface.

Personally I would place both of these models over the Vanguard ED IIs in terms of image quality. They both have wider fields of view and larger sweet spots than the Vanguard but at the cost of a heavier weight.

FWIW, I loaned a pair of the Therons out to two forum members. Hopefully they will chime in on the Theron thread with their experiences. One comment already was that they don't have much competition until you start getting into the $1000+ club.

Thanks for the specifics Frank!
 

Ribbons

New member
Conclusion:

All in all this is another excellent introduction at/around $500. You receive all of the latest features available on models at a much more expensive price point. It sets itself apart from similarly designed models by offering an extra .5x magnification and a diopter adjustment on the central focusing knob. Build quality is very good and the binoculars are well balanced. Athlon definitely chose an excellent design to use as their flagship model.

Great review Frank, I think I'll get myself a pair of these. I've never spent this much on binoculars before but I think these are a good choice. Thanks.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top