What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Vortex
Atlas Optics Intrepid review.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve C" data-source="post: 1511680" data-attributes="member: 56622"><p>I think that might be a fair assessment. One of the reasons I did not try and pre-order a Bushnell Legend HD was because it has been my understanding that the ED glass worked better at longer focal lengths rather than shorter ones. The Intrepid and its kin are longer than the Legend HD. </p><p></p><p>I once talked to the technical people at Vortex about the Vipers and they said while the Viper's XD glass was true ED glass (Abbe number over 90), the CA suppression was better in the 50mm Vipers than the 42 mm because the extra length worked to the advantage of the ED glass. </p><p></p><p>Also it would seem to be hard not to give up some edge distortion to the wide field of the Legend HD when keeping the price in the $300 range and using ED glass to boot. It seemed to me that there were too many compromises to balance there. I also look forward to the comments about the Legend HD.</p><p></p><p>But at any rate, the Intrepid seems to be a top quality binocular that seems to control CA quite well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve C, post: 1511680, member: 56622"] I think that might be a fair assessment. One of the reasons I did not try and pre-order a Bushnell Legend HD was because it has been my understanding that the ED glass worked better at longer focal lengths rather than shorter ones. The Intrepid and its kin are longer than the Legend HD. I once talked to the technical people at Vortex about the Vipers and they said while the Viper's XD glass was true ED glass (Abbe number over 90), the CA suppression was better in the 50mm Vipers than the 42 mm because the extra length worked to the advantage of the ED glass. Also it would seem to be hard not to give up some edge distortion to the wide field of the Legend HD when keeping the price in the $300 range and using ED glass to boot. It seemed to me that there were too many compromises to balance there. I also look forward to the comments about the Legend HD. But at any rate, the Intrepid seems to be a top quality binocular that seems to control CA quite well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Vortex
Atlas Optics Intrepid review.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top