What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Nature In General
Trees, Flowers, Plants and Shrubs
atrofuscus
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GDK" data-source="post: 1873853" data-attributes="member: 21712"><p>Hi Lorne,</p><p></p><p>As a statement I suspect you may very well be correct here, but it would be nice to know what is behind this statement - presumably the variation as described was first described as fulvofusca and not atrofuscus? Can you not state where?</p><p></p><p>As for the latin, I know very little solely based on guess work of animal and plant names, but they both appear to describe using similar terms (atro - fuscus) (fulvo - fusca) the darkening effect and browness of the lip. This would make sense I suppose, given it appears to be the only noticable difference between the mutation and a regular Bee Orchid. </p><p></p><p>I would guess that both plants fall into the category 'fulvofusca', unless you want to get very picky on those tram lines!</p><p></p><p>And regarding John's comment on lumping, well it does depend upon where you wish to draw that line, as they are all variations of plants "at the far end of the dark spectrum for O.apifera" are they not?</p><p></p><p>Cheers</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GDK, post: 1873853, member: 21712"] Hi Lorne, As a statement I suspect you may very well be correct here, but it would be nice to know what is behind this statement - presumably the variation as described was first described as fulvofusca and not atrofuscus? Can you not state where? As for the latin, I know very little solely based on guess work of animal and plant names, but they both appear to describe using similar terms (atro - fuscus) (fulvo - fusca) the darkening effect and browness of the lip. This would make sense I suppose, given it appears to be the only noticable difference between the mutation and a regular Bee Orchid. I would guess that both plants fall into the category 'fulvofusca', unless you want to get very picky on those tram lines! And regarding John's comment on lumping, well it does depend upon where you wish to draw that line, as they are all variations of plants "at the far end of the dark spectrum for O.apifera" are they not? Cheers [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nature In General
Trees, Flowers, Plants and Shrubs
atrofuscus
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top