What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Nature In General
Trees, Flowers, Plants and Shrubs
atrofuscus
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lorne" data-source="post: 1874731" data-attributes="member: 3425"><p>This is the info sent to us by Leslie Lewis who has now said he is happy for me to publish this;</p><p>"I decided to research the name(s) of the two Radipole Bee orchids,</p><p><strong><em>Ophrys apifera var. fulvofusca </em></strong></p><p>This variety was formally described by M. P. Grasso & Scrugli in Orchidee (Hamburg) 38: 47 (1987). It was subsequently re-described as the new combination "forma fulvofusca (M.P.Grasso & Scrugli) Delforge" in Natural. belges 38 (Orchid, 20): 246 (2007). </p><p> </p><p>I have not read the original description of this variety as I have been unable to access the 1987 paper. The 2007 publication (which I have) does not help since it simply uses the 1987 name as a basionym. However, the entry for Ophrys apifera var. fulvofusca M. P. Grasso & Scrugli in <a href="http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophrys_apifera" target="_blank">http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophrys_apifera</a> reads:</p><p> </p><p> "labello interamente bruno-rossastro, privo di macula", which Google translates as ", lip entirely reddish brown , without macula" .</p><p> </p><p>Similarly, the description in Bournerias which I sent you which in translation reads:</p><p> </p><p> "labelle rouge, dessin absent", i.e "red (= reddish-brown), pattern absent".</p><p> </p><p>It thus seems little doubt that this variety is characterised by a lip which is (reddish-) brown with no pattern . </p><p> </p><p>(The use of the term "reddish-brown" in the context of Bee Orchid lips seems to encompass a range of shades - see, for example, the photos of var. fulvofusca on Gunther Blaich's website</p><p><a href="http://www.guenther-blaich.de/artseite.php?par=Ophrys+apifera+var.+fulvofusca&abs=artclws" target="_blank">http://www.guenther-blaich.de/artseite.php?par=Ophrys+apifera+var.+fulvofusca&abs=artclws</a> )</p><p> </p><p><strong><em>Ophrys apifera var. atrofuscus</em></strong></p><p> <strong><em></em></strong>The few references to this variety which I have found are all directly or indirectly attributable to Lang. The only literature mentioned is his "Britain's Orchids" . However, the description of the variety in this book is nowhere near sufficient for the purposes of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN). It therefore seems almost certain that the variety has never been formally described in accordance with the ICBN and is thus not a valid name - it is in fact a "nomen nudum".</p><p> </p><p><strong>Radipole orchids</strong></p><p> </p><p>Since both the "atrofuscus" illustrated in Lang and the first Radipole plant still have the sides of the necklace pattern visible, neither appears to be a true "fulvofuscens Grasso & Scrugli".</p><p> </p><p>In contrast, the second plant does appear to be true var. fulvofusca since the pattern completely absent. </p><p> </p><p>I have been unable to find any previous record of var. fulvofusca in the UK. It therefore looks to me as if the second Radipole plant is the first - if so, it should probably be published.</p><p>Cheers Les."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lorne, post: 1874731, member: 3425"] This is the info sent to us by Leslie Lewis who has now said he is happy for me to publish this; "I decided to research the name(s) of the two Radipole Bee orchids, [B][I]Ophrys apifera var. fulvofusca [/I][/B] This variety was formally described by M. P. Grasso & Scrugli in Orchidee (Hamburg) 38: 47 (1987). It was subsequently re-described as the new combination "forma fulvofusca (M.P.Grasso & Scrugli) Delforge" in Natural. belges 38 (Orchid, 20): 246 (2007). I have not read the original description of this variety as I have been unable to access the 1987 paper. The 2007 publication (which I have) does not help since it simply uses the 1987 name as a basionym. However, the entry for Ophrys apifera var. fulvofusca M. P. Grasso & Scrugli in [url]http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophrys_apifera[/url] reads: "labello interamente bruno-rossastro, privo di macula", which Google translates as ", lip entirely reddish brown , without macula" . Similarly, the description in Bournerias which I sent you which in translation reads: "labelle rouge, dessin absent", i.e "red (= reddish-brown), pattern absent". It thus seems little doubt that this variety is characterised by a lip which is (reddish-) brown with no pattern . (The use of the term "reddish-brown" in the context of Bee Orchid lips seems to encompass a range of shades - see, for example, the photos of var. fulvofusca on Gunther Blaich's website [url]http://www.guenther-blaich.de/artseite.php?par=Ophrys+apifera+var.+fulvofusca&abs=artclws[/url] ) [B][I]Ophrys apifera var. atrofuscus [/I][/B]The few references to this variety which I have found are all directly or indirectly attributable to Lang. The only literature mentioned is his "Britain's Orchids" . However, the description of the variety in this book is nowhere near sufficient for the purposes of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN). It therefore seems almost certain that the variety has never been formally described in accordance with the ICBN and is thus not a valid name - it is in fact a "nomen nudum". [B]Radipole orchids[/B] Since both the "atrofuscus" illustrated in Lang and the first Radipole plant still have the sides of the necklace pattern visible, neither appears to be a true "fulvofuscens Grasso & Scrugli". In contrast, the second plant does appear to be true var. fulvofusca since the pattern completely absent. I have been unable to find any previous record of var. fulvofusca in the UK. It therefore looks to me as if the second Radipole plant is the first - if so, it should probably be published. Cheers Les." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nature In General
Trees, Flowers, Plants and Shrubs
atrofuscus
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top