What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swift
Audubon 10x50 vs Newport MkII 10x50
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 3485405" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>HR/5 Audubons are marked 430' or 8.21 deg., giving an apparent field of 69.75 deg. If they were 8.26 deg. the apparent field would be 70.21 deg. (i.e., 0.46 deg larger).</p><p></p><p>HR/5 Audubon-Kestrels 10x50 are marked 367' or 7.0 deg., giving an apparent field of 70.00 deg.</p><p></p><p>These calculations assume that the advertized magnifications are accurate and don't take distortion into account. So, in practical terms the two instruments have the same apparent fields.</p><p></p><p>Martin, — to be more specific about the Model 825 Newport we would need to know the first two digits of the s/n (which is the date of manufacture). There were at least two Newport models made, the first by Kutuba/Katsuma and the second by Hiyoshi Kogaku. The first had a FOV of 367' and the second a FOV of 420 deg., which are quite different. The latter would have a whopping apparent field of 80.01. </p><p></p><p>David, — out of curiosity, what is the s/n on your Newport? </p><p></p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 3485405, member: 14473"] HR/5 Audubons are marked 430' or 8.21 deg., giving an apparent field of 69.75 deg. If they were 8.26 deg. the apparent field would be 70.21 deg. (i.e., 0.46 deg larger). HR/5 Audubon-Kestrels 10x50 are marked 367' or 7.0 deg., giving an apparent field of 70.00 deg. These calculations assume that the advertized magnifications are accurate and don't take distortion into account. So, in practical terms the two instruments have the same apparent fields. Martin, — to be more specific about the Model 825 Newport we would need to know the first two digits of the s/n (which is the date of manufacture). There were at least two Newport models made, the first by Kutuba/Katsuma and the second by Hiyoshi Kogaku. The first had a FOV of 367' and the second a FOV of 420 deg., which are quite different. The latter would have a whopping apparent field of 80.01. David, — out of curiosity, what is the s/n on your Newport? Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swift
Audubon 10x50 vs Newport MkII 10x50
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top