What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Multimedia
TV & Radio
Autumnwatch 2009
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="naturistbird" data-source="post: 1604808" data-attributes="member: 50173"><p>Reg Unsprung...</p><p></p><p>Does anyone else think that an explanation about the identity of those animal skulls shown might have been a good idea?</p><p>Since Martin called it a quiz perhaps he should have explained the answers??</p><p></p><p>Too much faffing about and jolly merriment for my taste. It reminded me of the awfully sensible answers and stance taken by the presenters of Blue Peter (a childrens' show).</p><p>Surely the public can be given information without having to suffer the continual "Gosh, that's interesting, Simon/Martin/Chris", and having to watch the similarily continual tossing of Martin's hair and the up and down motion of his glasses as he seeks to need their use only for reading?</p><p></p><p>I may be a fuddyduddy but I'm afraid this jolly hockey sticks approach makes me want to cringe.</p><p></p><p>"Why not turn off?," you might ask.</p><p>I love the information given by the programme but not the way of presentation as if we were all at boarding school.</p><p>Sorry.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="naturistbird, post: 1604808, member: 50173"] Reg Unsprung... Does anyone else think that an explanation about the identity of those animal skulls shown might have been a good idea? Since Martin called it a quiz perhaps he should have explained the answers?? Too much faffing about and jolly merriment for my taste. It reminded me of the awfully sensible answers and stance taken by the presenters of Blue Peter (a childrens' show). Surely the public can be given information without having to suffer the continual "Gosh, that's interesting, Simon/Martin/Chris", and having to watch the similarily continual tossing of Martin's hair and the up and down motion of his glasses as he seeks to need their use only for reading? I may be a fuddyduddy but I'm afraid this jolly hockey sticks approach makes me want to cringe. "Why not turn off?," you might ask. I love the information given by the programme but not the way of presentation as if we were all at boarding school. Sorry. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Multimedia
TV & Radio
Autumnwatch 2009
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top