What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Bad Bokeh on new 100-400mm (or not?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cab1024" data-source="post: 1506350" data-attributes="member: 25012"><p>I got my Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L lens on Friday and took these shots on Saturday. First off I'm blown away by this lens. The detail and clarity is amazing, as is the the color saturation and vividness.</p><p></p><p>But, I was shocked by some of the unexpectedly weird effects I saw in the bokeh. It was very distracting, not at all buttery, and just plain weird. I found a technical explanation on <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=26712458" target="_blank">DPreview</a> that makes sense, but I'm wondering if other people have noticed it, or if you find it as aesthetically unpleasing as I do.</p><p></p><p>From what I saw on my first day of use was that this mostly occurs with grass, or any long hard-edged thing in the background. Anyway. Here are a few samples. What do you think? Have you seen this before? Does it bother you in your own photos? What can I do to minimize it? And what do you think of the explanation from DPreview?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cab1024, post: 1506350, member: 25012"] I got my Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L lens on Friday and took these shots on Saturday. First off I'm blown away by this lens. The detail and clarity is amazing, as is the the color saturation and vividness. But, I was shocked by some of the unexpectedly weird effects I saw in the bokeh. It was very distracting, not at all buttery, and just plain weird. I found a technical explanation on [URL="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=26712458"]DPreview[/URL] that makes sense, but I'm wondering if other people have noticed it, or if you find it as aesthetically unpleasing as I do. From what I saw on my first day of use was that this mostly occurs with grass, or any long hard-edged thing in the background. Anyway. Here are a few samples. What do you think? Have you seen this before? Does it bother you in your own photos? What can I do to minimize it? And what do you think of the explanation from DPreview? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Bad Bokeh on new 100-400mm (or not?)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top