What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Bad Bokeh on new 100-400mm (or not?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cab1024" data-source="post: 1507204" data-attributes="member: 25012"><p>No filter on the lens. The lens hood will have to handle all of the protection (which admirably shielded a dog shaking off this morning at the lagoon).</p><p></p><p>Thanks for all the input. I think it was the "perfect storm" of events to create the ugly bokeh. Just happened to occur on my first day out, and therefore threw me for a loop.</p><p></p><p>Since there seems to be no way to correct it, other than putting birds in locations they are not or greatly lessenigng the bank balance to open wider, I think I'll just have to live with it. And if it really bothers me in an otherwise perfect photo, I guess I'll have to blur it further in PP.</p><p></p><p>Now, to just get an otherwise perfect photo...</p><p></p><p>FWIW, I started shooting RAW this morning, with a plan for actually reviewing and culling after outings. I have no experience getting RAW files to look as I would expect a properly exposed jpeg to. But that is for another thread...on Aperture software...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cab1024, post: 1507204, member: 25012"] No filter on the lens. The lens hood will have to handle all of the protection (which admirably shielded a dog shaking off this morning at the lagoon). Thanks for all the input. I think it was the "perfect storm" of events to create the ugly bokeh. Just happened to occur on my first day out, and therefore threw me for a loop. Since there seems to be no way to correct it, other than putting birds in locations they are not or greatly lessenigng the bank balance to open wider, I think I'll just have to live with it. And if it really bothers me in an otherwise perfect photo, I guess I'll have to blur it further in PP. Now, to just get an otherwise perfect photo... FWIW, I started shooting RAW this morning, with a plan for actually reviewing and culling after outings. I have no experience getting RAW files to look as I would expect a properly exposed jpeg to. But that is for another thread...on Aperture software... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Bad Bokeh on new 100-400mm (or not?)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top